From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Mar 30 10:00:13 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NwenU-0006wK-9V for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:00:12 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:00:12 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] VOTE RIGHT NOW (was RE: [rdentato@gmail.com: Creation of CLL PDF and HTML version]) Message-ID: <20100330170011.GS6084@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20100330073349.GN6084@digitalkingdom.org> <20100330074134.GF3000@nvg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100330074134.GF3000@nvg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 626 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:41:34AM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:33:49AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > This is my entire understanding of the situation; 3 of us said > > "great", and then nothing happened. > > > > We should immediately apologize and give permission. I so move. > > Aye. That's a second. As parliamentary dude, or something, that means a vote. Since we're fucking *six months late*, you have 24 hours. I'm counting two Yes votes (me and Arnt) so far. If you think I'm being inappropriatly pushy with parliamentary procedure, let me know. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/