From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 31 10:27:30 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx1hR-0000E0-8d for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:27:30 -0700 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:27:29 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: NEW VOTE: Motion to amend Message-ID: <20100331172728.GM6084@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20100331171330.GL6084@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100331171330.GL6084@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 635 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Side comment here: what I'll specifically be asking them to is convert the .docx into a format that can produce both a web-based version and a book-printing-appropriate version; the .docx is useless for the former, and what they've produced is useless for the latter. If I need to change my amendment to specifically say that, please let me know. -Robin On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:13:30AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I move to amend my previous motion to read as follows: > > The LLG board will immediately, publically apologize to Remod for > dropping the ball (I'd like to do this, please). > > Further, in direct contravention of previous policy, the LLG will > publically post our master copy of the CLL, and request to Remod > that he apply his corrections to that, making in effect a new > master copy, to be approved by the BPFK as such and posted to the > website after said approval. > > Arguments: > > - I agree that it is important that there be official approval of > what the official CLL is (I *really* agree; see the essay I'll be > posting Any Day Now) > > - Right now, we look like a bunch of obstructionist fucks; the cat > is already out of the bag with Remod's production of the fixed > work, we can't legally stop him, and we shouldn't anyways: someone > who is willing to do that kind of work should be co-opted ASAFP. > I need people like that; the burden on me lately has felt quite > significant. > > -Robin > > -- > They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." > And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something > other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/