From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Wed Mar 31 10:29:13 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx1iy-0000No-Nc for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:29:13 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC094783 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o2VHSq83011144 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:28:52 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id o2VHSoeX011143 for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:28:50 +0200 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:28:50 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: NEW VOTE: Motion to amend Message-ID: <20100331172850.GK3000@nvg.org> References: <20100331171330.GL6084@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100331171330.GL6084@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 636 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:13:30AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I move to amend my previous motion to read as follows: > > The LLG board will immediately, publically apologize to Remod for > dropping the ball (I'd like to do this, please). > > Further, in direct contravention of previous policy, the LLG will > publically post our master copy of the CLL, and request to Remod > that he apply his corrections to that, making in effect a new > master copy, to be approved by the BPFK as such and posted to the > website after said approval. I second this amendment. I initially had reservations about the second part, since asking Remod to do work for us after we obstructed his PDF could come across as an insult. But I trust Robin to be able to find a wording that is suitable to the situation. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ [T]he savvy DXer will usually bet a pair of nickels he can pinpoint the DXCC country of the "chopity-chow-pit chow-chow-pi-chow" even before he hears the call sign. -John F. Lindholm, QST vol. 66 no. 3 p. 83