From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Mar 31 11:29:30 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.240.48]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx2fO-0005K6-Fx for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:29:30 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100331182919.PMEC26523.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:29:19 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.187.225.124]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id zuVK1d0042hfrC602uVKct; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:29:19 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Yd6n7kpaeok2sKwUQduWw1HOOSorp7OfhjNp8nTEG5A= c=1 sm=1 a=pdBoXiCLOy0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:17 a=ZWG3Dtwbk_WawPGqx1MA:9 a=_BAeCT2U0W8mfOC61rcCLqMX2CEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4BB3947C.5070409@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:29:16 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: NEW VOTE: Motion to amend References: <20100331171330.GL6084@digitalkingdom.org> <20100331172850.GK3000@nvg.org> <20100331173055.GO6084@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20100331173055.GO6084@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 643 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 07:28:50PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen > wrote: > >>On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:13:30AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> >>>I move to amend my previous motion to read as follows: >>> >>> The LLG board will immediately, publically apologize to Remod >>> for dropping the ball (I'd like to do this, please). >>> >>> Further, in direct contravention of previous policy, the LLG >>> will publically post our master copy of the CLL, and request >>> to Remod that he apply his corrections to that, making in >>> effect a new master copy, to be approved by the BPFK as such >>> and posted to the website after said approval. >> >>I second this amendment. >> >>I initially had reservations about the second part, since asking >>Remod to do work for us after we obstructed his PDF could come >>across as an insult. Did we actually obstruct it? I was under the impression that we had merely indecisively ignored it. >> But I trust Robin to be able to find a >>wording that is suitable to the situation. > > > As before, I'm calling that two votes. Bob? Matt? For the amended version, I vote yes. lojbab