From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 08 10:31:23 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:31:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NzvZa-00076I-Fu for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:31:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:31:22 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Resignation Message-ID: <20100408173122.GC11541@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20100408162920.GN3000@nvg.org> <4BBE0EC1.6010909@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BBE0EC1.6010909@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 654 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:13:37PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >>From my understanding of the bylaws, it may be effective > >>immediately if you so wish. > > > >This means that the office of President is now vacant, > > We probably need a formal motion to accept his resignation, on > something of this importance. I so move. I amend to accept his resignation from the board; he's beyond fed up with formal procedure. I've just removed him from the list; it's just Bob, Arnt, and Robin now. > After I review the bylaws myself, I will probably put my name in > the ring, with the personal commitment if elected to be as easy to > get rid of next time as I was the last time %^) Yes please (you as prez), if you can stand the fact that I have every intention of steamrolling over you WRT the BPFK stuff. > >>I will continue to do order fulfillment for the CLL. > > > >And thank you very much for that! > > I want to formally thank Matt for ALL that he has done for LLG, > both as Board member/President, and in his various other roles as > community leader, and to specifically compliment him for his > success in turning around order fulfillment. Again, I so move. Seconded. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/