From lojbab@lojban.org Thu Apr 08 10:54:56 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.240.7]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NzvwI-0000Dp-H3 for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:54:55 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100408175443.NHKO14747.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:54:43 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.187.225.124]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 35uj1e0062hfrC6025uje8; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:54:43 -0400 X-VR-Score: -140.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=u9aaE4Pfr0xy9UvPxuh9qFR1i2SV5RyaXjJQawTgqeY= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:17 a=p0_TM6V-ea-X39-K96EA:9 a=vKDsqtXWnUQTSgOIbDQA:7 a=0SYn2qUNGQ5daZwlTn8jzOrIxYAA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4BBE184B.10600@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:54:19 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Resignation References: <20100408162920.GN3000@nvg.org> <4BBE0EC1.6010909@lojban.org> <20100408173122.GC11541@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20100408173122.GC11541@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 655 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I amend to accept his resignation from the board; he's beyond > fed up with formal procedure. I've just removed him from the list; > it's just Bob, Arnt, and Robin now. I'll accept the amendment, reluctantly. >>After I review the bylaws myself, I will probably put my name in >>the ring, with the personal commitment if elected to be as easy to >>get rid of next time as I was the last time %^) > > Yes please (you as prez), if you can stand the fact that I have > every intention of steamrolling over you WRT the BPFK stuff. I don't feel I have any real say in the matter until the member meeting, since I consider the byfy to be a member creation, with the Board getting involved only for decisions requiring immediacy (like appointing you as jatna). I'm not sure that I see the byfy working as a totally independent organization, because to become so, it would have to incorporate, and thence be subject to all the legal necessities that encumber LLG. >>>>I will continue to do order fulfillment for the CLL. >>> >>>And thank you very much for that! >> >>I want to formally thank Matt for ALL that he has done for LLG, >>both as Board member/President, and in his various other roles as >>community leader, and to specifically compliment him for his >>success in turning around order fulfillment. Again, I so move. > > > Seconded. I think that is a majority on both motions, but Arnt is still presiding until decided otherwise. I ask that you communicate the latter motion to Matt when it is declared passed. Matt has told me in no uncertain terms to not communicate with him, and especially because I greatly respect him, I will try to abide by that wish. lojbab