From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Tue Apr 13 13:47:51 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O1n1H-00033e-Lk for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:47:51 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7801594780 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:47:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o3DKlFjp011519 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:47:18 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id o3DKlBQH011514 for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:47:11 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:47:11 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: [phma@phma.optus.nu: Re: jbonunsla] Message-ID: <20100413204711.GW3000@nvg.org> References: <20100410010118.GR11541@digitalkingdom.org> <4BC03DD7.8040500@lojban.org> <20100413171824.GA20647@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100413171824.GA20647@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 661 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:03AM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >We gave Pierre money to go last year, and I indicated we could do > > >the same this year. > > > > > >As you can see, I didn't actually "Yes, it's all taken care of", > > >but it looks like he's booked already. -_- > > > > > >Anyways, we can certainly afford it, and I don't consider my > > >personal annoyance at his in-person idiosyncracies sufficient to > > >ask him not to come; he's certainly a committed Lojbanist, he's > > >just kind of aspy. > > > > > >I move we give him the $250. > > > > second > > > > >I've book a shared room again this year; I expect to eat the > > >costs. > > > > If we are paying for no one else, I think we should be able to > > afford to match up-to that $250 towards a "Lojban room" for use at > > your discretion. If that would be appreciated, I so move. > > It would be appreciated. > > I second, I guess. :) Aye. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Taboos abound in almost any aspect of Tuvan life. [...] To name an example: the introduction of the Latin alphabet in 1930 was also believed to impose a threat on the health of women expecting a child. -- Mark C. van Tongeren: Overtone Singing