From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Jul 31 08:44:16 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.240.8]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OfEEN-0006b0-Gn for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:44:16 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100731154406.WYZU7060.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:44:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id ofk41e00W3Xcbvq02fk5Go; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:44:05 -0400 X-VR-Score: -80.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=F3jyDToQtwrlOJctVvcN/katAUVy1jaukLXBkxOH/x8= c=1 sm=1 a=7nHV7TtBneIA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=_bO5HwWgM6oqHnpAG-cA:9 a=h0uB4j-MVVlZrGd0lvQA:7 a=E7Q3J_EINvFcBrpu4XRAoUEk5N4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=QXcm860TS2MA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4C5444B5.4040602@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:43:49 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Annual meeting References: <4C52F348.3070601@lojban.org> <20100730174815.GR4511@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20100730174815.GR4511@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 677 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: >>If the motion is approved, I ask that the Secretary attempt before >>that date to verify that the current set of members is enrolled on >>that list with what we believe to be their current email. I have >>observed no traffic on the members list in more than 3 months and >>that is plenty of time for people have changed emails (and not to >>have noticed that they forgot to change addresses on the members >>list). > > If someone else can summarize the changes to the membership from > last year's meeting relative to > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=LLG+Members , I can > certainly do that. Do we have minutes from last year? (I didn't look) That is the only way that we would know changes to the membership. I know of no membership resignations during the year. >>I'll ask for Robin to report to the meeting both as byfy jatna and >>as Secretary/Treasurer (he usually is giving us a bank balance >>about now anyway; I haven't been paying attention to whether the >>Paypal account is being swept into the bank account, so in effect >>we may have two "bank balances". > > I've been reporting on both balances for years, dude. :) I'm sure you have %^) I just needed to get my ideas down in writing as to what we need reports on. I've always figured that the reports were among the most important part of the meeting, because that is the primary place for the members to hold us accountable. Hard for them to know what we are doing, if we don't tell them. >>Either Robin or I should report on the number of books sold, and >>he has more direct access to the numbers. > > Sold over what time period? Since the beginning of 2010 is fine, maybe a comparison to all of 2009. >>Are there any other "committee chairs" that we should hear from? >>One that comes to mind is whoever was converting CLL and >>incorporating the corrections, if that can be called a >>"committee". > > That has died, which is extremely bad. The person in question seems > to have totally disappeared. It seems to be resurrecting itself. This is good. I think people will work, but they need the reminder that we REALLY care. Maybe I can do a little more of that if I am still president after the meeting. lojbab