From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Oct 16 15:57:06 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.240.9]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7FgV-0001WG-QP for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:57:06 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101016225650.FJAC25033.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:56:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Kawp1f0083Xcbvq02awp7V; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:56:49 -0400 X-VR-Score: -40.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=zpAh8NT9SzMisnlzmt6xnbL/Bv7XoKhaPoxN5FSWxDQ= c=1 sm=1 a=59we2q7mdb0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=8Ph_vcHEAAAA:20 a=bT6X7LvBnhaITFEPIFsA:9 a=-z78mnAFPApfrJLX610A9rWuZ5kA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <4CBA2DAF.1020806@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:56:47 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: New Board meeting References: <4C9A674F.5020102@lojban.org> <4C9C9D74.5030603@lojban.org> <4CA090A0.8010807@lojban.org> <20101016195327.GM25393@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20101016195327.GM25393@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 708 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:40:00AM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > >>Hmm. I wonder if, rather than structuring the meetings around >>email, or IRC, if we structured them around the topic list as a wiki >>page, or maybe use an on-line forum. (We don't have one of those in >>the Lojban community) > > > Umm. > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/topics That is just a list of thread subject lines for the main list. I guess one can think of Google's Lojban List interface as an on-line forum, but it wasn't what I was thinking of. I'll do some more thinking before I say more, though. lojbab