From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Oct 21 11:15:42 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zfx-0007cs-90 for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:15:42 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:15:41 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: New Board meeting Message-ID: <20101021181541.GI23719@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <4C9A674F.5020102@lojban.org> <4CB47D1D.301@lojban.org> <20101016195607.GN25393@digitalkingdom.org> <4CBAC385.4030303@lojban.org> <20101017203635.GX25393@digitalkingdom.org> <4CBDE3C0.3040107@lojban.org> <20101020104510.GG8367@nvg.org> <4CC00061.1000301@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC00061.1000301@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 718 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:57:05AM -0400, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:30:24PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier, > >President and Founder - LLG wrote: > > > >>Veijo Vilva wrote: > >> > >>>On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Robin Lee Powell > >>> >>>> wrote: I move to re-elect > >>>the current slate. > >>> > >>> > >>>Seconded. > >> > >>The motion has been moved and seconded. > >> > >>We still should hear from Arnt that he is willing to serve > >>another term as VP. > > > > > >I would prefer not to serve another term as VP, but if elected I > >will serve. > > I will consider this an objection to the motion, requiring an > actual vote on the election, if the motion is not amended. > > Would Robin and Veijo like to amend their motion regarding the VP > candidate? Or should we proceed to a vote? > > If there is no response by 2359 Friday night, we will proceed to > vote on the moved slate. Why not have Veijo take the VP slot, since he seems to want to be actively involved? -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/