From veijo.vilva@gmail.com Thu Oct 21 22:00:54 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P99kJ-0002jK-1v for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:00:54 -0700 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so566496wyb.40 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:00:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=onKfzS4NbsAqT+i+wpN7I2qZiEyVzHkk23LlwvbCT4Q=; b=jmwOrqMc5eYNeElLhZkpF6BMlaXArCRIWKgQx0QQoMwnKbRMIzesL671TwxKnQB9et JePSgH6YXU+7EiGEw+0qiEDcJc7PDE4m48QVTIU3pJo8zatLnWF9JVts4XBoRDGr1G0j GLVFUUm2U/f+vMvMWHumtuqkg+jklg7AHtcSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=I7WmVzPObpC9/oxfksz8k6JuJjo8RZj+NgzKZAsCZCeYllVS/Gt0WRHkgbRchd2vuY DOn7rVWkakjFjjg0NbuUIUQB4qOciExfwyO6Ys6SP6hT8z1Rjk8g6JxmYkZdqqYtLkyG OO+1ObsEx9AYsrTS1fUZXso9USAysCFM0r6iE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.199.81 with SMTP id w59mr6679828wen.100.1287723642863; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.44.137 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:00:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CC0F715.5030305@lojban.org> References: <4C9A674F.5020102@lojban.org> <4CB47D1D.301@lojban.org> <20101016195607.GN25393@digitalkingdom.org> <4CBAC385.4030303@lojban.org> <20101017203635.GX25393@digitalkingdom.org> <4CBDE3C0.3040107@lojban.org> <20101020104510.GG8367@nvg.org> <4CC00061.1000301@lojban.org> <20101021181541.GI23719@digitalkingdom.org> <4CC0F715.5030305@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:00:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: [llg-board] Re: New Board meeting From: Veijo Vilva To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daa93a4d421004932d86a8 X-archive-position: 720 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: veijo.vilva@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board --0016e6daa93a4d421004932d86a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> Would Robin and Veijo like to amend their motion regarding the VP >>> candidate? Or should we proceed to a vote? >>> >>> If there is no response by 2359 Friday night, we will proceed to >>> vote on the moved slate. >>> >> >> >> Why not have Veijo take the VP slot, since he seems to want to be >> actively involved? >> > > I can support it. I'll take this as an attempt to amend. If Veijo accepts > the amendment (and the job), I'll allow three days from his acceptance for > objection. If there is objection within 3 days, we will vote, otherwise, > I'll call the motion passed without objection. > OK, I accept. Veijo -- web site: http://galactinus.net/vilva/ --0016e6daa93a4d421004932d86a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org&= gt; wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
Would Robin and Veijo like to amend their motion regarding the VP
candidate? =A0Or should we proceed to a vote?

If there is no response by 2359 Friday night, we will proceed to
vote on the moved slate.


Why not have Veijo take the VP slot, since he seems to want to be
actively involved?

I can support it. =A0I'll take this as an attempt to amend. =A0If Veijo= accepts the amendment (and the job), I'll allow three days from his ac= ceptance for objection. =A0If there is objection within 3 days, we will vot= e, otherwise, I'll call the motion passed without objection.

=A0OK, I accept.

= =A0=A0 Veijo

--

=A0 web site: http://galactinus.net/vilva/
--0016e6daa93a4d421004932d86a8--