From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Oct 27 11:59:45 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.240.59]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBBDq-0006xV-My for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:59:45 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101027185928.LOOP21335.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:59:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id PuzT1f0013Xcbvq02uzTSo; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:59:27 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Of5FRk7D4fcJlrWbzxPvWNsT1UhKEYt7m7ky24PLP4c= c=1 sm=1 a=9QsEZjMpxHQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=8UGfj7iNs7Z6pjmeavcA:9 a=sJEQlZpPUMHF-X8PMQP00MBx_4AA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <4CC8768C.4050801@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:59:24 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Fulfillment. PLEASE READ. References: <20101024210028.GB9723@digitalkingdom.org> <20101027164123.GU1105@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20101027164123.GU1105@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 732 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:00:28PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >>Or I could just work on the new CLL, which I could probably have >>ready in a week, and then there's no problem anymore. >> >>But I'm really reluctant to just dump the old CLLs. > > > Bob, how many do we have left at this point? hundreds (probably in the 300-500 range)