From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Feb 24 17:40:57 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Psmfw-00033I-NI; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:40:56 -0800 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:40:56 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: Luke Seubert Cc: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: What are the restrictions on using the Lojban logo? Message-ID: <20110225014056.GA11116@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luke Seubert , llg-board@lojban.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 769 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:41:01PM -0500, Luke Seubert wrote: > Good day, > > In learning Lojban, I decided to use a TiddlyWiki as a personal > notebook, and to include the Lojban logo and colors as part of the > layout. I assume that so long as this notebook was for my own > personal use, that the LLG would not object to my using its logo > in this way. > > However, TiddlyWikis can be posted online, viewable and editable > by multiple users. If I were to put my notebook online, what would > be the LLG policy with respect to logo usage? I'm copying the board to double-check, but I really don't think we care as long as it's associated with Lojban and not, like, "Lojban sucks ass" or something. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/