From lukeseubert@gmail.com Thu Feb 24 19:47:40 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsoeX-0000pe-0D for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:47:40 -0800 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so1698518fxm.40 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:47:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bjFtIduuaXjatZmYJPgkRX47JVzFvtm+5y7D0lmI8K4=; b=w/p2309REURFxWSgd5JnrxjLChQRDWLJRXVZ2RtczlbiSl8GwZF3tJ9PSKG1avz7N0 HON82VUvs+t5+whjfxtkoJIPn2l8kBtrSSuuFoS/2Pr8zdv/hgV1IWzR3v9lZj+IwY83 hIF1q9sZ12EVqLMcvwPGvDSrxc4lb8YE3VrI8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WFCHYLf0Su0tQqel0n+SW6yoS9EhUoFBrz5Uemz6soTyr4bMqTD0tBZTd/3252EpxU jVKn/vdOfCHkAWaGP56EC9HXp1JvSDM3HByFpfUFKSnNxv0OWE8f0MJrA3yVgmP7lPkv BczvwiIewtiq9qdtMDKjMChfvOMvavDCX2oxM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.145.15 with SMTP id b15mr2022082fav.42.1298605596208; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.103.11 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:46:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110225014056.GA11116@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110225014056.GA11116@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:46:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [llg-board] Re: What are the restrictions on using the Lojban logo? From: Luke Seubert To: Luke Seubert , llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-archive-position: 771 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeseubert@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board > I'm copying the board to double-check, but I really don't think we > care as long as it's associated with Lojban and not, like, "Lojban > sucks ass" or something. > Thank you. I'll check the board postings to see what answers turn up. Cheers, Luke Seubert