From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Feb 25 14:17:36 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net ([68.230.241.217]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5yf-00018b-VO for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:17:36 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20110225221723.DPMW32466.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:17:23 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.187.237.100]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id CNHJ1g00C2AfMYu02NHJYs; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:17:23 -0500 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=me5+aO1p2EVAL3056avTo6G305x65KCHQu4dHjhIegM= c=1 sm=1 a=Ae7VuBSG18IA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:17 a=ND58Yd0c5nRX_1iRvTkA:9 a=zIquOcfSnpVDh4yv4tI1DOqcAS0A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <4D682A7D.8070502@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:17:33 -0500 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: What are the restrictions on using the Lojban logo? References: <20110225014056.GA11116@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20110225014056.GA11116@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 773 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:41:01PM -0500, Luke Seubert wrote: > >>Good day, >> >>In learning Lojban, I decided to use a TiddlyWiki as a personal >>notebook, and to include the Lojban logo and colors as part of the >>layout. I assume that so long as this notebook was for my own >>personal use, that the LLG would not object to my using its logo >>in this way. >> >>However, TiddlyWikis can be posted online, viewable and editable >>by multiple users. If I were to put my notebook online, what would >>be the LLG policy with respect to logo usage? > > > I'm copying the board to double-check, but I really don't think we > care as long as it's associated with Lojban and not, like, "Lojban > sucks ass" or something. We have not trademarked the logo, so we might have trouble suddenly deciding that we did care, if others have already used it. If we ever have a problem, we'll need a new logo and to go through the legal stuff. But I think it is unlikely to be necessary. lojbab