From timo@wakelift.de Wed Jul 06 09:56:34 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.wybt.net ([195.191.196.3] helo=mail.wouldyoubuythis.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QeVOm-0007FF-9P for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:56:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wouldyoubuythis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E9448F44 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:54:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.wybt.net Received: from mail.wouldyoubuythis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.wybt.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fe2nr6MkpQ3X for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:d552:24:216:eaff:feb3:4a04] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d552:24:216:eaff:feb3:4a04]) by mail.wouldyoubuythis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D38948100 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E1493B7.4040201@wakelift.de> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:56:23 +0200 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Suggestion for a Cooperation with Anki, the spaced repetition system References: <4E14343E.2080205@wakelift.de> <20110706164813.GW20563@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: <20110706164813.GW20563@nvg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 798 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timo@wakelift.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On 07/06/2011 06:48 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > I'm an Anki user, and I don't understand how this would work. > > Which deck? I use four decks on two devices, some of which I've made myself, > and some of which are made by other Anki users (“shared decks”). Half of them > don't have anything to do with Lojban. And what card? Jbovlaste entries are > often not usable as flashcards, in my experience. Of course the technical details still have to be determined. If you have more than one deck, you'd have to set up once where your cards go, and there would have to be a sort of matching from jbovlaste to the kind of data model you have set up. Once you set all that up, it would be saved though and would allow for instant pushing of cards in the future. Are you interested in talking to the anki dev with me about this? Maybe you have the right kind of non-amazed, investigative, level-headed view on this problem. mu'o mi'e timos