Received: from localhost ([::1]:33481 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YALCQ-00031j-Cu; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:17:10 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net ([68.230.241.217]:59814) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YALCI-00031R-ES for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:17:07 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo110 ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150111161653.LFEN26047.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo110> for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:16:53 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo110 with cox id egGt1p00H1LDWBL01gGtK3; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:16:53 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.54B2A1F5.0107,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=GKHW5JxK c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=vKzndnNFKpQA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=daVZotozZMFGRy0yuQgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <54B2A1F6.5090105@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:16:54 -0500 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On 1/11/2015 10:52 AM, Craig Daniel wrote: > I will be working during the live meeting, so I'd very much appreciate > seeing its logs. I'll collect and post a few thoughts before then, and > for that day I give my proxy to Riley to use as he thinks I would. [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [68.230.241.217 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in lojban.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [Llg-members] January 18 2015 IRC meeting logs X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 1/11/2015 10:52 AM, Craig Daniel wrote: > I will be working during the live meeting, so I'd very much appreciate > seeing its logs. I'll collect and post a few thoughts before then, and > for that day I give my proxy to Riley to use as he thinks I would. I don't intend that there be any voting during the IRC session, (or any other parliamentary procedures) so proxies should not be necessary. The idea is to have a more informal discussion time when people are getting feedback in real-time, and maybe we can get some agreements in a few hours rather than weeks. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members