Received: from localhost ([::1]:34777 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YAUaE-0002Iu-7F; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:18:22 -0800 Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:47165) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YAUa8-0002Ic-Np for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:18:20 -0800 Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hn15so9484121igb.1 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:18:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=miM2ollZ/Lh4TVbVHJS934vp3hoan/iKSeYt7ZSeL4M=; b=U9XrFnOM95cKwoQqNRoY1u4ZJJYsqwxwF+9F12roloh0dzcNmgKkL3RJfbxxjUQUPr JubxQW3v6PQBJj6Dgv+U6DNUBjyY4pGe2nhxt0VQtRQnstMR5nfbZY5dkpmdLywKBF/3 BOTb090p+PLsDdoW1qY3vUIStGTz1du3SFvcYFn1elA8efJ0I6fpPX7UIFYghzaNT/hc dhgcuhoLgvs+QFzfVfzkbk1VUznlB6pcUnpyAvtPidgCxMVHlTvvYRwrWdvvmHP4+bK3 2G8JQfJlSZk1kUlW1NGy+1x5eDON/BbjDh+1jX3jm25iSCmuJXAXT9Sr3twCYslOQBU2 X9cg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.28 with SMTP id i28mr25643903ioo.73.1421029090500; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.8.198 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:18:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150111181830.GD3433@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <54B146BE.3030503@lojban.org> <54B1D51C.4070908@lojban.org> <20150111181830.GD3433@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:18:10 -0500 Message-ID: From: Matt Arnold To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I apologize to Lojbab in particular, and to the rest of the list in general. You're right about that. Given that I don't remember what offices and/or memberships I currently hold, it seems hypocritical to hold them, in light of which forms of participation energize me, and which ones frustrate me. In keeping with whichever rules of order probably require that non-participants are technically not resigned (even if they are not heard from for years), the most respectful thing I can do is to offer sort of a blanket resignation from whatever offices and memberships I might still hold. I so move, and second my own motion. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.213.174 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (matt.mattarn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: Re: [Llg-members] CLL republication - continuation of the meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4275210825399426760==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============4275210825399426760== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11352f7227a682050c6b1e78 --001a11352f7227a682050c6b1e78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I apologize to Lojbab in particular, and to the rest of the list in general. You're right about that. Given that I don't remember what offices and/or memberships I currently hold, it seems hypocritical to hold them, in light of which forms of participation energize me, and which ones frustrate me. In keeping with whichever rules of order probably require that non-participants are technically not resigned (even if they are not heard from for years), the most respectful thing I can do is to offer sort of a blanket resignation from whatever offices and memberships I might still hold. I so move, and second my own motion. I would like to offer all thanks and encouragement to those who stay on, particularly the really great newcomers I have seen recently. -Epccott On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:25:07AM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > > Arg. Why can't you? Fine. $2000. Let the record show, for the > > umpteenth time, that I regard parlaimentary procedure as a dumb > > waste of our time. > > You're welcome to not be an LLG member, but the LLG is a *business > organization*. It has rules. Deal with it. > > You may be suffering from the general confusion that the LLG has > something to do with the language community. > > -- > http://intelligence.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i dafsku lu na go'i li'u .e > lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e > lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni > li'u > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --001a11352f7227a682050c6b1e78 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I apologize to Lojbab in particular, and to the rest of th= e list in general. You're right about that. Given that I don't reme= mber what offices and/or memberships I currently hold, it seems hypocritica= l to hold them, in light of which forms of participation energize me, and w= hich ones frustrate me.=C2=A0In keeping with whichever rules of order proba= bly require that non-participants are technically not resigned (even if the= y are not heard from for years), the most respectful thing I can do is to o= ffer sort of a blanket resignation from whatever offices and memberships I = might still hold. I so move, and second my own motion.

I= would like to offer all thanks=C2=A0and encouragement to those who stay on= , particularly the really great newcomers I have seen recently.=C2=A0
<= br>
-Epccott=C2=A0
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Robin Lee Pow= ell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:25:07A= M -0500, Matt Arnold wrote:
> Arg. Why can't you? Fine. $2000. Let the record show, for the
> umpteenth time, that I regard parlaimentary procedure as a dumb
> waste of our time.

You're welcome to not be an LLG member, but the LLG is a *busine= ss
organization*.=C2=A0 It has rules.=C2=A0 Deal with it.

You may be suffering from the general confusion that the LLG has
something to do with the language community.

--
http://intelligence.= org/ :=C2=A0 Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i dafsku lu na go'i li'u= .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e = lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mam= ta be do cu sofybakni li'u

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--001a11352f7227a682050c6b1e78-- --===============4275210825399426760== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============4275210825399426760==--