Received: from localhost ([::1]:50649 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YD5EO-0001O0-NH; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:50:32 -0800 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:57149) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YD5EN-0001Nt-1t for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:50:31 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v8so22557585qal.7 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:50:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=lmvXBWSTjvWFub524JUDslYBnDhOhsQ7/uScry68QWc=; b=bS0mW2wK1npzSYj7a2D6yIXodvcqrvf3DwCx3lUebQCX3TeVFLPPpl5RMlBNvJ62+S PTPA5yEUkbmONIYVCx50kJVpEmaRJ0F9qAX5VsnTkY0I6jdW+B6iBFk9q8NAzKz4wsid kVw47s8YiYTta61ksQ0aCdbFngCZCU3wrJ4egNv6OhxnHL++ti9jGPnttp2BT2PHhOlS 8o0KNd/UfdmWEw/S1TUk7zJFWh3c07m8dpyeCSAIAQRM1RJo5nCCN0sybks3BIa9uiOe z0x+tqfElg5hZU47wm29cm0HvTdsEqtylYz5vn9tfvFD/82AXNtZn2/ZrcPKDMJpkvI+ lI8Q== X-Received: by 10.229.172.67 with SMTP id k3mr38327371qcz.11.1421646624411; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-69-249-31-89.hsd1.nj.comcast.net. [69.249.31.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm5160833qgd.49.2015.01.18.21.50.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:50:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:50:20 -0500 From: Alex Burka To: llg-members@lojban.org Message-ID: <0CD5A578A47549238B8B046A01B8846C@gmail.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.9 X-Spam_score_int: 9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: coi .i la'ede'e jalge tu'a lo se .irci nunpe'i be ca lo cabdei (.i ta'o ba'a la gleki ba mrilu lo cusku'i vreji ca da) .i mi na rova'e co birti lo du'u lo catni kamnyselti'i* cu sarcu .iku'i ja'aku mi kamnyti'i* lo nu ma'a zanru lo cnino velcki be zo zabna .e zo mabla va'o la jbovlaste .i lo cnino velcki xa'o nenri la jbovlaste (to la .xorxes. pu setca toi) gi'e pu se zanru bypyfyky .iku'i ri'agi lo laldo velcki cu panoki'o roi se cmicu'a gi lo cnino cu nonselji'u lo samselse'u be fi la'o .kib. DICT .kib. be'o .e lo mucti sisku tutci .e ro lo so'i vlaste samtci poi pilno lo jbovlaste terpruce .i ja'o sa'u mi stidi lo nu renoki'o roi cmicu'a lo re cnino velcki .i pei ma kaidji lo ka kamnyselti'i sarji remoi [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (durka42[at]gmail.com) 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.216.48 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (durka42[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: [Llg-members] nu ningau so'u se jbovlaste / updating a few jbovlaste entries X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0984873163963249352==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============0984873163963249352== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="54bc9b1c_4b40cd92_12109" --54bc9b1c_4b40cd92_12109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline coi .i la'ede'e jalge tu'a lo se .irci nunpe'i be ca lo cabdei (.i ta'o ba'a la gleki ba mrilu lo cusku'i vreji ca da) .i mi na rova'e co birti lo du'u lo catni kamnyselti'i* cu sarcu .iku'i ja'aku mi kamnyti'i* lo nu ma'a zanru lo cnino velcki be zo zabna .e zo mabla va'o la jbovlaste .i lo cnino velcki xa'o nenri la jbovlaste (to la .xorxes. pu setca toi) gi'e pu se zanru bypyfyky .iku'i ri'agi lo laldo velcki cu panoki'o roi se cmicu'a gi lo cnino cu nonselji'u lo samselse'u be fi la'o .kib. DICT .kib. be'o .e lo mucti sisku tutci .e ro lo so'i vlaste samtci poi pilno lo jbovlaste terpruce .i ja'o sa'u mi stidi lo nu renoki'o roi cmicu'a lo re cnino velcki .i pei ma kaidji lo ka kamnyselti'i sarji remoi [translated] This came out of the IRC meeting today (I think la gleki is going to post a full cleaned-up transcript at some point.) I'm not totally sure an official motion is required. But anyway, I move that we approve the new definitions of {zabna} and {mabla} in jbovlaste. The new definitions are already there (entered by la xorxes), and they've received the BPFK's approval, but the old definitions have 10000 votes, so you can't see the new ones when using DICT clients, the online query interface, or one of the many dictionary tools that work from jbovlaste exports. So I simply propose to give the new definitions 20000 upvotes. Can I get a second? - mu'o mi'e la durkavore * ca'e lo ka za'e kamnyti'i (to zoi gy. make a motion .gy.) zo'u: fabu catni stidi febu noi za'e kamnyselti'i ku'o fibu noi kamni --54bc9b1c_4b40cd92_12109 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
coi

.i la'ede'e jalge tu'a = lo se .irci nunpe'i be ca lo cabdei (.i ta'o ba'a la gleki ba mrilu lo cu= sku'i vreji ca da)
.i mi na rova'e co birti lo du'u lo catni ka= mnyselti'i* cu sarcu .iku'i ja'aku mi kamnyti'i* lo nu ma'a zanru lo cnin= o velcki be zo zabna .e zo mabla va'o la jbovlaste
.i lo cnino = velcki xa'o nenri la jbovlaste (to la .xorxes. pu setca toi) gi'e pu se z= anru bypyfyky .iku'i ri'agi lo laldo velcki cu panoki'o roi se cmicu'a gi= lo cnino cu nonselji'u lo samselse'u be fi la'o .kib. DICT .kib. be'o .e= lo mucti sisku tutci .e ro lo so'i vlaste samtci poi pilno lo jbovlaste = terpruce .i ja'o sa'u mi stidi lo nu renoki'o roi cmicu'a lo re cnino vel= cki
.i pei ma kaidji lo ka kamnyselti'i sarji remoi
<= br>
=5Btranslated=5D
This came out of the IRC meeting today (I think la gl= eki is going to post a full cleaned-up transcript at some point.)
I'm not totally sure an official motion is req= uired. But anyway, I move that we approve the new definitions of =7Bzabna= =7D and =7Bmabla=7D in jbovlaste.
The new definitions are alrea= dy there (entered by la xorxes), and they've received the BP=46K's approv= al, but the old definitions have 10000 votes, so you can't see the new on= es when using DICT clients, the online query interface, or one of the man= y dictionary tools that work from jbovlaste exports. So I simply propose = to give the new definitions 20000 upvotes. Can I get a second=3F

- mu'o mi'e la durkavore

* ca'e= lo ka za'e kamnyti'i (to zoi gy. make a motion<= /i> .gy.) zo'u: fabu catni stidi febu noi za'e kamnyselti'i&n= bsp;ku'o fibu noi kamni

--54bc9b1c_4b40cd92_12109-- --===============0984873163963249352== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============0984873163963249352==--