Received: from localhost ([::1]:54510 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YNtBX-0006d4-Ao; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:12:15 -0800 Received: from static.217.217.251.148.clients.your-server.de ([148.251.217.217]:57382 helo=cracksucht.de) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YNtBQ-0006cx-71 for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:12:13 -0800 Message-ID: <54E3E6E0.6000204@selpahi.de> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 02:12:00 +0100 From: selpahi To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Fwd: Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org So how about a vote, since nobody is voicing any objections? This meeting really needs to move on. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members