Received: from localhost ([::1]:36438 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YSPU7-0002wG-GP; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:30:07 -0800 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:35145) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YSPU5-0002vq-3v for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:30:06 -0800 Received: by wibbs8 with SMTP id bs8so14451086wib.0 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:29:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=azokkMyCmLhhDXDQtnXeLscFrZuskhaG6tOFLHEpV7k=; b=H6raEywsPuRxoROSN73b7d/CclMubLjJgwq391yGzvrWe3Ns3D6UIdBtaYFbyKaNR+ B5/V/indq9KOBlUCvxPdw8QY2Jqg9loqpI1lVJqpDGFZtGmrqPw0BluXgyb0LesO8thQ ibrzO664Kxj5esNBGtVHrI01KkoDbHFlhUn7SBBlZgRREW6sp9Oxb2J9AGeGyjna784p 0bl/e2uSiPhe3rBcU4wQWEHWZG+TYRtPSbYnISDnzLDJQ/wke+kQdokDv89GGWhZLmQV O0phFGkkmr+FfzxM6/Uno/NCICYguhg7aTWVNWQg6axPWr0tdu7TIPh9wrauK4Jw7ZB1 ViUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.59.112 with SMTP id y16mr59997893wjq.36.1425299392482; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.174.193 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 04:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.174.193 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 04:29:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54ED23C4.8050008@lojban.org> References: <54ED23C4.8050008@lojban.org> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:29:52 +0000 Message-ID: From: And Rosta To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion on BPFK passes. Remaining Old business. X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4735436281457536643==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============4735436281457536643== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba97cc4fcd35305104d5f9a --047d7ba97cc4fcd35305104d5f9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 25 Feb 2015 01:22, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < lojbab@lojban.org> wrote: > > No one has spoken up expressing interest in either BPFK membership or the chairmanship. I'm interested in membership, tho lack of time and dwindling familiarity with Lojban limit the usefulness of any contribution I could make. Discussions in Lojban would pass me by unread, so my involvement would be further peripheralized by that. If there were still to be BPFK voting, I'd choose to continue to proxy my vote to xorxes, not merely out of laziness on my part but rather out of confidence that on any lojbanological issue, whatever my opinion on it is, xorxes's opinion is bound to be either the same or better. Happily, jboske culture has changed: there are nowadays loads of people with lojbanological expertise, and no significant body of Lojbanists trying to stymie the completion of the language design on lojbanological principles. So on the whole I feel my BPFK involvement would be pleasingly superfluous. And --047d7ba97cc4fcd35305104d5f9a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 25 Feb 2015 01:22, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG&qu= ot; <lojbab@lojban.org> wrot= e:
>
> No one has spoken up expressing interest in either BPFK membership or = the chairmanship.=C2=A0

I'm interested in membership, tho lack of time and dwind= ling familiarity with Lojban limit the usefulness of any contribution I cou= ld make. Discussions in Lojban would pass me by unread, so my involvement w= ould be further peripheralized by that. If there were still to be BPFK voti= ng, I'd choose to continue to proxy my vote to xorxes, not merely out o= f laziness on my part but rather out of confidence that on any lojbanologic= al=C2=A0 issue, whatever my opinion on it is, xorxes's opinion is bound= to be either the same or better.

Happily, jboske culture has changed: there are nowadays load= s of people with lojbanological expertise, and no significant body of Lojba= nists trying to stymie the completion of the language design on lojbanologi= cal principles. So on the whole I feel my BPFK involvement would be pleasin= gly superfluous.

And

--047d7ba97cc4fcd35305104d5f9a-- --===============4735436281457536643== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============4735436281457536643==--