Received: from localhost ([::1]:47481 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYfk-00042T-9m; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:30:52 -0800 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:42978) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYfb-000426-Rm for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:30:49 -0800 Received: by wiwh11 with SMTP id h11so39668479wiw.1 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=mi+mcPBhRRFLaNAvkCxS9yfctHutWfJ+NSvxvxH2eEg=; b=giDy60VCsoX/sRKG0J1wbqWCMon1obqpcAK+ZxcOiuLy1dc2WaN7JTZPY4CwJwJX2q uuGlqlZI6Sg8eEFrsTScX/QBGBaKvTh0gGz/KbD6Lzbijs5gF2alHqg0QGRPi/Hukqer YSmef2QKZqZV4Kntoti9bg3Q9NI2b19Ey1qQcWUcOjMUNCmVUbz1U29XJKb8HOMu1s3q TVCdtSBe0cMSA/ZZUvyZdJJ92a5yY7qOLodDSVhENZXnpDHNYGrFdoD5k0vUFFsiruhT HA6aRKjon1hlJomARXT+QJwHnrF/93BhCuPBLa5J3Wt9tFurT5tO++GquMybGChxPvhw qYXg== X-Received: by 10.180.12.84 with SMTP id w20mr24623010wib.9.1425573036912; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:30:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.240.197 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:30:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54ED23C4.8050008@lojban.org> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:30:16 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion on BPFK passes. Remaining Old business. X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7540061580248203614==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7540061580248203614== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2507677746b05108d1652 --001a11c2507677746b05108d1652 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-03-02 15:29 GMT+03:00 And Rosta : > > On 25 Feb 2015 01:22, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < > lojbab@lojban.org> wrote: > > > > No one has spoken up expressing interest in either BPFK membership or > the chairmanship. > > I'm interested in membership, tho lack of time and dwindling familiarity > with Lojban limit the usefulness of any contribution I could make. > Discussions in Lojban would pass me by unread, so my involvement would be > further peripheralized by that. If there were still to be BPFK voting, I'd > choose to continue to proxy my vote to xorxes, not merely out of laziness > on my part but rather out of confidence that on any lojbanological issue, > whatever my opinion on it is, xorxes's opinion is bound to be either the > same or better. > > Happily, jboske culture has changed: there are nowadays loads of people > with lojbanological expertise, and no significant body of Lojbanists trying > to stymie the completion of the language design on lojbanological > principles. So on the whole I feel my BPFK involvement would be pleasingly > superfluous. > BPFK work would be rather useful for fluent speakers and it's supposed to be a very boring work, namely, documenting and voting on what has already been proposed or used. However, you could still share your thoughts of what you'd like to see in Lojban, e.g. features found in other languages, philosophies or cultures even if those languages are e.g. programming ones. If you don't use it other might find it useful and start using it. But BPFK work ... this language can now evolve through usage only, Lojban is almost complete (in the sense of usability), BPFK can only deal with additions to it, explanations of it in other languages. This is what BPFK pages in the wiki represent. And > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --001a11c2507677746b05108d1652 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-03-02 15:29 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:

On 25 Feb 2015 01:22, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG&qu= ot; <lojbab@lojba= n.org> wrote:
>
> No one has spoken up expressing interest in either BPFK membership or = the chairmanship.=C2=A0

I'm interested in membership, tho lack of time an= d dwindling familiarity with Lojban limit the usefulness of any contributio= n I could make. Discussions in Lojban would pass me by unread, so my involv= ement would be further peripheralized by that. If there were still to be BP= FK voting, I'd choose to continue to proxy my vote to xorxes, not merel= y out of laziness on my part but rather out of confidence that on any lojba= nological=C2=A0 issue, whatever my opinion on it is, xorxes's opinion i= s bound to be either the same or better.

Happily, jboske culture has changed: there are nowadays load= s of people with lojbanological expertise, and no significant body of Lojba= nists trying to stymie the completion of the language design on lojbanologi= cal principles. So on the whole I feel my BPFK involvement would be pleasin= gly superfluous.


BPFK work would be rat= her useful for fluent speakers and it's supposed to be a very boring wo= rk, namely, documenting and voting on what has already been proposed or use= d.

However, you could still share your thoughts of= what you'd like to see in Lojban, e.g. features found in other languag= es, philosophies or cultures even if those languages are e.g. programming o= nes.

If you don't use it other might find it u= seful and start using it.

But BPFK work ... this l= anguage can now evolve through usage only, Lojban is almost complete (in th= e sense of usability), BPFK can only deal with additions to it, explanation= s of it in other languages. This is what BPFK pages in the wiki represent.<= /div>

<= font color=3D"#888888">

And


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members


--001a11c2507677746b05108d1652-- --===============7540061580248203614== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7540061580248203614==--