Received: from localhost ([::1]:38272 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aCMJx-00018w-Su; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:57:49 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:36343) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aCMJq-00018h-0r for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:57:48 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p187so196704554wmp.1 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:57:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cX8WcC1zZTeWOjxajQVarnNAoeDLknTKE0f+REXMz/4=; b=P6juOf3i/kg8X2zeHUTI1v53pg6cth8SVUBJe1WDeDIB9ZO80fImse0Lbw7ZvrkFvX hBdbmznf1fvSG9+oUUmfjx9ZWCxS9a1ROBhhWmlC5LrqS4LEevN7sHdwPmqkORdE1WDB BcKFKt4P2VMGAry/knv4FJI44rtN7XJgyLwNycAqTIwADczIGtlxNcn22jRRw2/zqQCa ojRlIW0V+LT9D0GYJI3J/liI7UZjsGYsTvkUF8UqmUAepe0gPqs4E11xDk1aGNuijgmV 5VWsi6Q3+zH4S/LOiVXC5jy8MM5xKZpZdq0RAjxAjF6qFUYrUDTwkyLNu7dEcrGdC4lQ JD/Q== X-Received: by 10.28.47.11 with SMTP id v11mr30978413wmv.27.1451026650591; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:57:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.92.206 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:56:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <563CBDA4.5080308@selpahi.de> <4E514785-A922-4D75-B34A-EFB3880C5712@gmail.com> <566701E3.4060408@lojban.org> <566CD949.7010504@lojban.org> <5671E710.2020407@lojban.org> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:56:50 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4567125011327290766==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============4567125011327290766== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11423e001178450527b37823 --001a11423e001178450527b37823 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-12-25 5:33 GMT+03:00 guskant : > It relieves my anxious that you don't plan to destroy CLL. How ever, > you have already removed from CLL2.0 "voi" and "observative" that are > not yet agreed by BPFK. > Well, actually you are wrong, which might be explained that git is not a tool easy for everyone. For observatives I just made push requests as you can see here: https://github.com/lojban/cll/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed Since there is no official policy on how to assess such push requests another person merged them into the CLL 2.0 branch. After that I had no idea how the process should go on so I as for {voi} I simply temporarily commented it out, not removing that content. Maybe I should have made another push request for it. But push request can again be merged by someone else. Of course, I'm not suggesting banning anyone from editing that branch because LLG members seem to be mostly inactive and non-LLG members might just drop that work and we'll result in no new edition of CLL at all. --001a11423e001178450527b37823 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2015-12-25 5:33 GMT+03:00 guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>:
It relieves my anxious that you don't plan to destroy CLL. How ever, you have already removed from CLL2.0 "voi" and "observative&= quot; that are
not yet agreed by BPFK.

Well, actually you are= wrong, which might be explained that git is not a tool easy for everyone.<= /div>

For ob= servatives I just made push requests as you can see here:
https://github.co= m/lojban/cll/pulls?q=3Dis%3Apr+is%3Aclosed

Since there is no off= icial policy on how to assess such push requests=C2=A0
another person merged them into the CLL 2.0 branch.

After that I = had no idea how the process should go on so I as for {voi} I simply tempora= rily commented it out, not removing that content.
Maybe I should have made another push request for it. But push reque= st can again be merged by someone else.
Of course, I'm not suggesting banning= anyone from editing that branch because LLG members seem to be mostly inac= tive and non-LLG members might just drop that work and we'll result in = no new edition of CLL at all.

--001a11423e001178450527b37823-- --===============4567125011327290766== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============4567125011327290766==--