Received: from localhost ([::1]:54833 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aYJzQ-0005kV-Rt; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:24 -0800 Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:33885) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aYJzI-0005jY-UR for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:21 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id of3so108129038lbc.1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=R347Gq1r6YlUj2IbpICNogkzTC1jjX1WCVzRA/PGJA0=; b=xTztr1L0sPNfLZw0N6VCoGBnJrR6N87mCM7IbWNu0ocnQMCUi15hHjLu4JtTxtEhlI aQpVWDBnOzDzksts/VVfnuj6G0iBNW3rlk0IpKuhSBYnkGp/t1GUrx0K/goaHw6mKu+g lm0D8IobliM9IX4VCkVMCLIUZmYGCOS0WqOzvI6SLjgnGs1StkqOv+iGGM6z7V3VqPha UM6cwYpRHZ2eiyCj6P+yT3Iu388Y7Q3cEgQhJePd8UYSF5kKtHdQvxwxw4X/a4AQmVPf 5RhioUOS4DU06k7TnQWo2hsU9foJdh/bKY/7qCgJAMLqX+2h3+MSSeJ1HV/QUj8QPHfT CEhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R347Gq1r6YlUj2IbpICNogkzTC1jjX1WCVzRA/PGJA0=; b=dV+YVM+JTQ/tOO3AJXlKzUo/2lZsDyI2cUV7AMGxMqsN1wb0q/eZXV0Ni+ZNlizUoC VrSfjkM1FbPXjVz8qIZ5KiK87QoqACCNavFmTuXjd9PXpo18hEEh6D6yMTQL6Es1Rbd3 V0VDURz8FU/KOVJPVHJAbpglAoublhl7s4a0J3XVZOpjG98cV+QuTO6Ci0HTNE982ft3 rEgPJgHl9MoGcT9WcxdAv3Y8pKOt9N45VSTzeX2sE4yOZm9pELnjY47vYfOLADtOcXNm mXidZEPVMN67XbZIJNb/tSZSEd5kQoiM1OrpQEPwLMRz0VmW0ql0MJhoQ40LBuyksyEi 3jLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSzOAAtNszsIqLIn1/vp9AXslh6zwZaNnMv5heDcSVuWJDHXsYphnKBJ2euVZUlzmXchj8xcawmh2n0nw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.162.231 with SMTP id yd7mr12945366lbb.40.1456260909840; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.40.193 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.40.193 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:55:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56CCA114.90203@lojban.org> References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com> <56C1998B.5050005@lojban.org> <82DDFA36-4BF2-44E7-AF8A-8A810E50EE0A@gmail.com> <56CCA114.90203@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:55:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: And Rosta To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] LLG Annual Meeting - Board Election X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2484938844430774547==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============2484938844430774547== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011608e03b3dbc052c762a9d --089e011608e03b3dbc052c762a9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 23 Feb 2016 18:12, "Bob LeChevalier" wrote: > > At this point, And Rosta and Craig Daniel have indicated conditional willingness to serve on the Board. I suppose I did technically indicate willingness, but there are lots of LLG members who'd do no worse than me (i.e. read and respond to email moderately thoughtfully) and some of those would do better, and I think it would be better to have board members more personally invested in Lojban than I nowadays am. But at any rate, I meant to not nominate myself. If someone wants to nominate me, fine, but they should also think of all the other lojbanists they could nominate. And --089e011608e03b3dbc052c762a9d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 23 Feb 2016 18:12, "Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> At this point, And Rosta and Craig Daniel have indicated conditional w= illingness to serve on the Board.=C2=A0

I suppose I did technically indicate willingness, but there = are lots of LLG members who'd do no worse than me (i.e. read and respon= d to email moderately thoughtfully) and some of those would do better, and = I think it would be better to have board members more personally invested i= n Lojban than I nowadays am. But at any rate, I meant to not nominate mysel= f. If someone wants to nominate me, fine, but they should also think of all= the other lojbanists they could nominate.

And

--089e011608e03b3dbc052c762a9d-- --===============2484938844430774547== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============2484938844430774547==--