Received: from localhost ([::1]:53665 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1acrBb-0000MF-5y; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:10:43 -0800 Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:36008) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1acrBV-0000Da-8F for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:10:41 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c3so110384936vkb.3 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:10:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Jeuzd0IW9h0hxaQPnUVqC9NfsayZ5FNbrU22ConCmOE=; b=FsGf2wTUD27IZyFE+q5YJr/Ojjixy+4bwR+pP2P+pUlsDG7e8DCh6GSAvbEUnfrhSw nrS5DRCFSez4EurOOnppH8B6+i2nn85IJXqmkiaimlmpoRUfPiVTPChlrGR6sr41PfgD /br5HaoCnbDmTMOfMuh5cByFIcfQuudMgQnoFruN4gdN8WPHtuJwhO9qlccCh6TSJqiI /t+1bR1Cp+hG9RRpG8qgyC6YsjqLjln2AOfgjICXxgbfXkVvTSY+y+M8ntbbuujh/Fsc K3erls9cLDgMRNCy1ptPVHErFgxOMjei5dYBhMRisphQsjJ8aAwlvs4KOryoPdMfhQcb HO4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Jeuzd0IW9h0hxaQPnUVqC9NfsayZ5FNbrU22ConCmOE=; b=ZGS7VIf9sj3b35wxixFZrtGA7Y2ciFImB8ZIXmzUAtEmdf0d9WJgE2Z1W7hneQCWS0 YM8sVyYCM87PIu62z5wyxM42qK+iV7N80eNzrLzCpkVnpKWf8Qak86aKnxYbbY+RS0AR OvsE1A4fp4qomfnxL0U2bzJPT1tMHK/GqHLlkdLglGWlKhfNINSVFpb6jokl9bkmT8Gp 1r1Eo6D/hbwbDAIMBSqFs60lxu8gXHN4pTEm13SMplWPABYeIlkbIvGVAKPAdU3fxqy2 N2Tyn53AkghIJ7x/OP5RSTUTEqbMAmhQPCUj6hzbS1t8xwSGBEgyZbkU8xpFvqL8K49j rXCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIIX1Iog1TGhY5/XOsu53kSlsB4/DanyhsVma0zT2Gs3CNveEgcEHfh7owTQqCFLlvocxxPYgV00fvAMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.180.85 with SMTP id d82mr16493406vkf.83.1457341830940; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.159.38.135 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.159.38.135 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com> <56C1998B.5050005@lojban.org> <82DDFA36-4BF2-44E7-AF8A-8A810E50EE0A@gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20160302202535.032fcf18@cox.net> <56D83411.7010708@lojban.org> <0C990E0D-8744-4953-AF3E-20D14740B59A@gmail.com> <78EAFF74-5A30-4315-921C-4208B456EC69@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 04:10:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Curtis Franks To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Clarification of votes X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3391481433111558117==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============3391481433111558117== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114382ce264cd5052d71d674 --001a114382ce264cd5052d71d674 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you need me to be less provisional? I had the caveat that I would vote for myself if any of the people that I had listed declined. If we are starting to solidify answers, then it might be better for me to just pick a solid, unconditional ballot. Assuming that you do (if not, then ignore what follows in this message until you do), I remove Alex Burka (durka42) from the list of my votes in favor of myself, although Indo believe that he is a capable and engaged Lojbanist. On Mar 6, 2016 22:55, "Craig Daniel" wrote: > I vote as per your interpretation, yes. > > - Craig > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016, 10:49 PM Ali Sajid Imami > wrote: > >> I'll revise my list to the following: >> >> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >> >> > Curtis Franks >> > Ali Sajid Imani >> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >> > And Rosta >> >> > Miles Forster (selpa'i) >> On Mar 7, 2016 8:41 AM, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" >> wrote: >> >>> Ali, I count 8 votes here, but you only have 7 to give. It=E2=80=99s yo= ur choice >>> which one, but if it makes it easier, I would be glad to lose your vote= in >>> favor of the others. =E2=80=94Riley >>> >>> On Mar 6, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Ali Sajid Imami >>> wrote: >>> >>> I agree with the following interpretation: >>> >>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>> > Curtis Franks >>> > Ali Sajid Imani >>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>> > And Rosta >>> > Karen Stein >>> > Miles Forster (selpa'i) >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ali Sajid Imami >>> CTO >>> Khabaristan Times >>> LinkedIn >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:57 AM, guskant wrote: >>> >>>> 2016-03-07 1:25 GMT+00:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch : >>>> > In preparation for the end of voting, I tallied votes, but was >>>> uncertain how to record the votes for Craig and Ali. >>>> > >>>> > Craig voted for "everybody else on the ballot=E2=80=9D. Given the ti= ming of >>>> the vote, I would be inclined to interpret that =E2=80=93 using lojbab= =E2=80=99s list =E2=80=93 as: >>>> > >>>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>>> > And Rosta >>>> > Karen Stein >>>> > guskant >>>> > >>>> > Ali voted for =E2=80=9Ceveryone currently on the ballot=E2=80=9D. By= the time of the >>>> vote, Ali and Curtis had declared themselves candidates; guskant might= not >>>> be a candidate at this point, according to her intention to decline >>>> nomination in the case that there were more than seven candidates. Ale= x >>>> Burka had also received votes, but had not accepted nomination. >>>> Accordingly, I would be inclined to interpret Ali=E2=80=99s vote as: >>>> > >>>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>>> > Curtis Franks >>>> > Ali Sajid Imani >>>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>>> > And Rosta >>>> > Karen Stein >>>> > >>>> >>>> Miles Forster (selpa'i) had already received four (4) votes before >>>> Ali's vote. Alex Burka (durka42) neither declined nor accepted >>>> nomination, but Selpa'i accepted nomination just after Ali's vote. >>>> Sorry for interruption but it's for clarification. >>>> >>>> mi'e la guskant >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --001a114382ce264cd5052d71d674 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do you need me to be less provisional? I had the caveat that= I would vote for myself if any of the people that I had listed declined. I= f we are starting to solidify answers, then it might be better for me to ju= st pick a solid, unconditional ballot.

Assuming that you do (if not, then ignore what follows in th= is message until you do), I remove Alex Burka (durka42) from the list of my= votes in favor of myself, although Indo believe that he is a capable and e= ngaged Lojbanist.

On Mar 6, 2016 22:55, "Craig Daniel" &= lt;craigbdaniel@gmail.com>= wrote:

I vote as per your interpretation, yes.

- Craig


On Sun, Mar 6, 2016, 10:49 = PM=C2=A0Ali Sajid Imami <ali.sajid.imami@gmail.com> wrote:

I'll revise my list to the followi= ng:

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)=

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta

> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Miles Forster (selpa'i)

On Mar 7, 2016 8:41 AM, "Riley Martinez-Lyn= ch" <shunp= iker@gmail.com> wrote:
Ali, I count 8 votes her= e, but you only have 7 to give. It=E2=80=99s your choice which one, but if = it makes it easier, I would be glad to lose your vote in favor of the other= s. =E2=80=94Riley

O= n Mar 6, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Ali Sajid Imami <ali.sajid.imami@gmail.com> wrote= :

I agree with the following interpretati= on:

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gl= eki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0R= iley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Ros= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
<= span style=3D"color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.= 8px">> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Miles Forster (selpa'i)



Regards,<= div>Ali Sajid Imami
CTO

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:57 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-03-07 1:25 GMT+00:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com>: > In preparation for the end of voting, I tallied votes, but was uncerta= in how to record the votes for Craig and Ali.
>
> Craig voted for "everybody else on the ballot=E2=80=9D. Given the= timing of the vote, I would be inclined to interpret that =E2=80=93 using = lojbab=E2=80=99s list =E2=80=93 as:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0guskant
>
> Ali voted for =E2=80=9Ceveryone currently on the ballot=E2=80=9D. By t= he time of the vote, Ali and Curtis had declared themselves candidates; gus= kant might not be a candidate at this point, according to her intention to = decline nomination in the case that there were more than seven candidates. = Alex Burka had also received votes, but had not accepted nomination. Accord= ingly, I would be inclined to interpret Ali=E2=80=99s vote as:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
>

Miles Forster (selpa'i) had already received four (4) votes befo= re
Ali's vote. Alex Burka (durka42) neither declined nor accepted
nomination, but Selpa'i accepted nomination just after Ali's vote.<= br> Sorry for interruption but it's for clarification.

mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list=
Llg-members= @lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs


__________________________= _____________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

--001a114382ce264cd5052d71d674-- --===============3391481433111558117== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============3391481433111558117==--