MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFoHDTdYyc=Jxg+HFWuNepz9_BO5vfdjdqy3+XBV-Z3Z=35m7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com>
 <56DE1D83.8050901@lojban.org> <8EC7FC36-8C8F-43FD-AE6A-C704D1D9C2CE@gmail.com>
 <12678381.nPyR9sEY1K@caracal> <56E0AE11.8020708@lojban.org>
 <56E1F54E.3040501@lojban.org> <56E5FFAF.1030405@selpahi.de>
 <CAFoHDTdYyc=Jxg+HFWuNepz9_BO5vfdjdqy3+XBV-Z3Z=35m7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:53:31 +0300
Message-ID: <CAO7bV+j4sDezv1hece66FmHUMa2QFa5MoOpGCRbSmaqZeJDfyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting - Old Business
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1360103788489993537=="
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

--===============1360103788489993537==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11442bbe8cc92a052e658548

--001a11442bbe8cc92a052e658548
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2016-03-19 12:26 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:

> Maybe some sort of separation in dictionary lists like jbovlaste (which
> mix proposals with official words) can be introduced so that higher-level
> sorting is facilitated without easy bleed over from the standpoint of the
> user's perception; I know that words are marked as experimental if they
> are, but this note is easy to miss. A bigger notice or even separate
> websites would make it more obvious. I am not sure how to implement this
> idea, though- I am merely spitballing. In any event, I do not believe that
> experimental entries in jbovlaste should be deleted (even in the event of a
> revitalized list which has been combed through with some entries being
> potentially upgraded to official stature) without the consent of the
> creator or, in extreme cases, with overwhelming and exceptional reason to
> do so (which primarily applies to ill-formed lujvo and possibly cmene, I
> think).


.i la jbovlaste as it is now doesn't suit these needs. A simple online
shared spreadsheet with adding/changing deleting entries in it by LLG or
BPFK would be enough. Exporting it to different formats in this format can
be done according to officially demanded specifications or unofficially by
anyone.

--001a11442bbe8cc92a052e658548
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
2016-03-19 12:26 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:curtis.w.franks@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">curtis.w.franks@gmail.co=
m</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Maybe some sort of sepa=
ration in dictionary lists like jbovlaste (which mix proposals with officia=
l words) can be introduced so that higher-level sorting is facilitated with=
out easy bleed over from the standpoint of the user&#39;s perception; I kno=
w that words are marked as experimental if they are, but this note is easy =
to miss. A bigger notice or even separate websites would make it more obvio=
us. I am not sure how to implement this idea, though- I am merely spitballi=
ng. In any event, I do not believe that experimental entries in jbovlaste s=
hould be deleted (even in the event of a revitalized list which has been co=
mbed through with some entries being potentially upgraded to official statu=
re) without the consent of the creator or, in extreme cases, with overwhelm=
ing and exceptional reason to do so (which primarily applies to ill-formed =
lujvo and possibly cmene, I think).</blockquote></div><br>.i la jbovlaste a=
s it is now doesn&#39;t suit these needs. A simple online shared spreadshee=
t with adding/changing deleting entries in it by LLG or BPFK would be enoug=
h. Exporting it to different formats in this format can be done according t=
o officially demanded specifications or unofficially by anyone.</div></div>

--001a11442bbe8cc92a052e658548--


--===============1360103788489993537==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--===============1360103788489993537==--