Received: from localhost ([::1]:49877 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1asG0a-0000Ub-St; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:43:00 -0700 Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:33118) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1asG0T-0000Tj-QH for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:42:58 -0700 Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n62so119219374vkb.0 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=cAQWa+n9UlGekYRdMATaTbtyh2Slchm+P7CEVSdLA9s=; b=Ws4rOhxQJTpN+Ge5Kf4MSVCfC3r4E5tCIJM2qxnaWTXtTdKTFFHVFna3z4qsA9vKnS P4IbAxRYgMVF7ePraYGu/NKrtMt5jbQ32lgXO/LVrdrj5qnKNST0oU/PdRkEifJhcmb0 alapIxTuDT+UV6rolX7snbl0+3SVTmKZBc/MEfhSO8WHix3uGvXdG8w8ib9LJ35AfYDH MaogbxsWVVfNY3ltHo6ZHV2Zz5CnHzojJvOIiWFZsa6FCIOw1lZgXj1cg5BGUkl3RCcp goOQvaHMQx34+PyD7OwhDi2hH55TyMpi0scSl451l4jnrb8sP/CjZ5gWurPD7MlIrQJr UhUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=cAQWa+n9UlGekYRdMATaTbtyh2Slchm+P7CEVSdLA9s=; b=g01/SK7aEw8QyqtTVSJCLk07xINRI0GgKWTIrfDEppBu6SVeOYkVCRWiD35fyhIiVW D8LWaBS2P45XE/TIPwZ1dValhMpbhxlFHL7l3s31a6f19in0qDdYoDd8zdoAg+qwEYSD Ply0T/YitBld7JpfPTKD/HanePVkxWmrskDdNNNRDe4a5CsiSOD5g2Y2/kOi5K9dH2/K c9NaZBF0Ve4/xWBlzuCe05+m03okBL3NcCvVuA4qEbmj8T5zZOWQT+eEezKOAFF8fwhe ADzCxpQfbzWspaRa8E01vOjr8ogJc729iYl05GxZSCYie2OGhcl/49DK003DYCHS+86e zx/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV6+MERsVzYAu7PF83fr5Mg81t7DswKNhI7TrZGXg50VGllAQn7rrN730DwClcn+Dwb234gzyARAMyYXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.176.4.162 with SMTP id 31mr2174028uaw.128.1461012167007; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.7.133 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:42:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57152A58.3080305@lojban.org> References: <571271C9.7050002@lojban.org> <50A08C82-B160-4ADB-B5D9-D2FBB307C32E@gmail.com> <57152A58.3080305@lojban.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:42:46 -0300 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] *** CHAIR INTERRUPTS DISCUSSION FOR MOTION TO ADJOURN *** Re: Annual meeting: New Business, anyone? X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7433299069741074663==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7433299069741074663== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1252903a26d60530c867ac --94eb2c1252903a26d60530c867ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I vote against adjournment. mi'e xorxes On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > On 4/17/2016 9:30 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > >> I am in the middle of a seven-game home stand, and I'll be out of town >> on business when it ends, so I don't believe I'm likely to be any more >> so until next week. In the interests of fast processes, I hereby give my >> proxy to la .karis., effective from just after this message until 23:59 >> EDT on April 26. >> >> For the sake of procedure being ensured to reflect membership >> intentions, I second the motion to adjourn, but cast my vote on the >> procedural point this immediately triggers as .ienai / Nay. >> > > Per the statement of the Parliamentarian, this second triggers an > immediate vote WITHOUT discussion. > > Thus, please stop discussing the various other motions and topics that > (finally) attracted some discussion, until a majority has voted one way or > another on the motion to adjourn. > > While I suspect that some other people have already voted on adjournment > embedded in the messages already posted, I ask that people explicitly vote > on the motion to adjourn ***in a separate post***. > > (I will accept this message as Craig's vote given his explanation, but I'd > rather not even read the existing discussion posts (to look for adjournment > votes), so that I can keep track of what motions are on the floor, if the > meeting is not adjourned.) > > Please vote. If I see a majority of the entire membership voting one way > or another, I will rule on adjournment without waiting. Otherwise, voting > on the motion to adjourn continues until end of day Wednesday (20 April) UT > (and a majority of the votes cast will then determine the result) > > lojbab > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --94eb2c1252903a26d60530c867ac Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I vote against adjournment.

mi'e xo= rxes

O= n Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LL= G <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
On 4/17/2016 9:30 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
I am in the middle of a seven-game home stand, and I'll be out of town<= br> on business when it ends, so I don't believe I'm likely to be any m= ore
so until next week. In the interests of fast processes, I hereby give my proxy to la .karis., effective from just after this message until 23:59
EDT on April 26.

For the sake of procedure being ensured to reflect membership
intentions, I second the motion to adjourn, but cast my vote on the
procedural point this immediately triggers as .ienai / Nay.

Per the statement of the Parliamentarian, this second triggers an immediate= vote WITHOUT discussion.

Thus, please stop discussing the various other motions and topics that (fin= ally) attracted some discussion, until a majority has voted one way or anot= her on the motion to adjourn.

While I suspect that some other people have already voted on adjournment em= bedded in the messages already posted, I ask that people explicitly vote on= the motion to adjourn ***in a separate post***.

(I will accept this message as Craig's vote given his explanation, but = I'd rather not even read the existing discussion posts (to look for adj= ournment votes), so that I can keep track of what motions are on the floor,= if the meeting is not adjourned.)

Please vote.=C2=A0 If I see a majority of the entire membership voting one = way or another, I will rule on adjournment without waiting.=C2=A0 Otherwise= , voting on the motion to adjourn continues until end of day Wednesday (20 = April) UT (and a majority of the votes cast will then determine the result)=

lojbab

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

--94eb2c1252903a26d60530c867ac-- --===============7433299069741074663== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7433299069741074663==--