Received: from localhost ([::1]:34688 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1avwS0-0001iB-Ox; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:38:32 -0700 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:33715) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1avwRu-0001i3-TG for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:38:31 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x1so26304197obt.0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=62KUP22A4fn5ah2Uxv/o2cYhziN85Jn2jhfbGXRCyCE=; b=eXsFcseA4PoEn4rgauXqP13+fMixO9P3CaLEGBmKE2zxh51Z0aWnM6cnE+oO2gaSnt 9sMLkKPTAzJ2CE35/sCLWosB6O8AuAVYXPjICxGEW2Mekc9KOFYjsZtF7mx3buEwkyj5 wxEsqAsV7f7NtxxP+HUT7k+fACSkqqsRDCiox9Tl1xaMG0S7z7qBeqzCitTVtzYCi49C vhFB2AHVhW/LRUKJJmqR47LaasC3EOHDJ8QHvoFUqPeDQn1pYzHbsNTcqBCnMMKRCGL+ mKyqFffpsknprJdBwOOQd9/vVZ45sYd7YCcMnw6QzCvHQWBwdGQ25wAYw856enLASXAf 3xeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=62KUP22A4fn5ah2Uxv/o2cYhziN85Jn2jhfbGXRCyCE=; b=cUdwxMM+gWNHMgVuvHLfEccdWS5tQsRjGX0gA5OB6gPcBA2tCAo4R6PEV4bO8Jb+YC C81cTUbbBixNqh/UPjxW9/1ABR0tFFVUpog78Rni8Wwk8qIG/9k21YDKM/fPqlE/dUDR ENAU5+j/vrsoP1RTyJBoRB7zUthuveqfiXOzYlAS/bzSx1/voWsz4wArWQXZmS4aD0fC mkXe/PIB20nbRtvmvaLtCibAEXXPl3HxnehX/V5wwsFOJi5YZ/rOMcePoSVLIekKm2xR JlyGxarcDE5uzBp2oZ/o9BGM5/P7dYJu3ATDvIK4sKqfAObLFHuNNQZ2uwky8HRFxc4/ aLig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVpaCs6X6F97e4T1QMDuehKALik1kByB4bw03475X90Lvg9KeGjvQFlBrOizkNV6iPvPUezNiHf6fLK1w== X-Received: by 10.60.67.101 with SMTP id m5mr8543935oet.19.1461890300845; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:38:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <571EA53F.6040906@lojban.org> <2A767C1B-DA0E-49F5-931C-1F61D5ECDD86@gmail.com> <15C48E81-1622-494E-B351-F5EA656D38F7@gmail.com> <5720FF17.2050307@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: From: Craig Daniel Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:38:11 +0000 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Community Manager position? X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9083420244701042934==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============9083420244701042934== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c308a4152699053194dc23 --001a11c308a4152699053194dc23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I strongly support the notion of a community manager position. To that end, I request the opinion of our parliamentarian on what would be required to make it happen, because I don't feel I fully know. I hope we can then properly draft a formal motion on the matter to try to approve rather than sit around saying it's a good idea. - mi'e kreig On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, 2:37 PM Curtis Franks wrote: > Discussion could still be killed by political strategicizing. But it might > be worth it. > On Apr 27, 2016 14:34, "Karen Stein" wrote: > >> This is why the members would then be able to vote to add time. >> >> On April 27, 2016 2:04:07 PM EDT, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder >> - LLG" wrote: >>> >>> On 4/27/2016 5:30 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, this is needed. >>>> We need to give X days for everyone to post a new topic and Y days after >>>> opening each topic to be discussed. If we don't fit into that time then >>>> it goes off the meeting to return next year. >>>> And this can be done both for new business and old business. >>>> >>> >>> The most controversial things would never get decided. >>> >>> lojbab >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> >> -- Karen Stein -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --001a11c308a4152699053194dc23 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I strongly support the notion of a community manager positio= n. To that end, I request the opinion of our parliamentarian on what would = be required to make it happen, because I don't feel I fully know. I hop= e we can then properly draft a formal motion on the matter to try to approv= e rather than sit around saying it's a good idea.

- mi'e kreig


On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, 2:37 = PM Curtis Franks <curtis.w.= franks@gmail.com> wrote:

Discussion could still be killed by political strategicizing. B= ut it might be worth it.

On Apr 27, 2016 14:34, "Karen Stein" &= lt;comcaresvcs@g= mail.com> wrote:
This is why the members would then be able to vote to add time.
On April 27, 2016 2:04:07 PM EDT, "Bo= b LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote: 
On 4/27/2016 5:30 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
 Yes, this is needed.
 We need to give X days for ever=
yone to post a new topic and Y days after
 opening each topic to be disc=
ussed. If we don't fit into that time then
 it goes off the meeting =
to return next year.
 And this can be done both for new business and old=
 business.

The most controversial things would never ge=
t decided.

lojbab



Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban=
.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members<=
br>

-- Karen Stein --

_______________________________________________=
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs
--001a11c308a4152699053194dc23-- --===============9083420244701042934== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============9083420244701042934==--