MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c27e17a3-9c01-5f14-a740-ebedf4e593a3@selpahi.de>
References: <8d3f617b-433a-326a-b64a-c756882d5160@lojban.org>
 <c27e17a3-9c01-5f14-a740-ebedf4e593a3@selpahi.de>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:09:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJOCZUcXsKZMXqS5eBuwypvOD0hM+HR2EZ9PxJfyqe=kEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] (2015 Annual meeting) - anyone besides gleki
	paying attention?
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

2016-06-09 18:43 GMT+00:00 selpahi <selpahi@selpahi.de>:
> On 09.06.2016 18:35, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote:
>> It makes it more important that other people start stepping up.  It has
>> been something like 6 weeks since the last meeting discussion died away,
>> or 4 weeks if one considers the discussion of copyrights to be part of
>> the meeting.  I can't tell, because guskant started the discussion, and
>> I don't think I ever saw a motion.   But 4 or 6 weeks with nothing
>> happening, and not even a comment from the membership is kinda sad.
>

As for keeping copyrighted artworks put on the official website, I
think it is better to be discussed more, but it is not urgent. It can
be postponed to the next meeting of LLG.

>
> Mind you, this kind of lethargy is something I've had to deal with for years
> as well, and now as BPFK chair. But I don't want to seem ungrateful for the
> work that BPFK has done in the last year. The lojban community is mostly
> made up of people with a vague interest in the language, people who would
> likely never see Lojban as more than a hobby. This can be hard to deal with
> for people like myself, who put their everything into the language, who live
> and breathe Lojban, who hold it as dear as a family member, or a loved one.
> Sometimes it hurts to realize how indifferent so many people are to it.
>

At least I'm not at all indifferent to Lojban. It is my motivation to live.


>> There were earlier motions, I think from Craig and guskant, that I don't
>> think were even seconded.
>
>
> I think we might want to revisit guskant's proposal regarding the management
> of the "official" social network accounts that carry the name "lojban.org"
> or similar. Right now gleki owns most or all of them and I can't say he's
> always doing the best job at making Lojban or its institution look good.
> Someone with a better sense of public relations should be given exclusive
> access to, e.g., the twitter account. (People like mukti)
>

Thank you for supporting one of my ideas. People being dazzled by my
personal hatred for Gleki never take my suggestion seriously, but the
same suggestion by a neutral person like you should bring a more
constructive discussion. I agree that Mukti will do good job on public
relations, though I'm worrying that it might bring him too much stress
taking the responsibility besides secretarial work.


>
> "If camgusmis ever finishes his work on the CLL, we will have to call him
> xamgusmis."
>

u'i ie sai mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members