Received: from localhost ([::1]:58626 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cilgc-0002M1-B2; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:35:42 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net ([68.230.241.216]:41766) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cilgW-0002LA-Hw for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:35:41 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo109.cox.net ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.28 201-2260-151-171-20160122) with ESMTP id <20170228173530.MDDT873.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo109.cox.net> for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:35:30 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.244.98]) by eastrmimpo109.cox.net with cox id qHbV1u00b2869s801HbV8v; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:35:30 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.58B5B4E2.017F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=MIDumapl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:117 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=pf7JjY0GzGsQZEu5mb0A:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none References: To: llg-members@lojban.org From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:36:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2016 Annual Meeting of the Logical Language Group, Inc. - call to order and roll call X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 2/19/2017 2:44 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>> Next we have reports of Officers and committees. Again, we will have to >>> wait for mukti to post the Treasurers report after his return. >> >> I had hoped mukti would be back by now, and would have posted the above, >> but it seems not to be the case. In order to move the meeting along, I >> will suggest that someone move that we defer these items until the 2017 >> meeting. > > mukti is back, but has apparently not had time to post these. Bu there > has been no motion to defer them to the next meeting. Mukti has now posted a treasurer's report. Given the delay, I won't wait for a motion. If there is no objection by end of day Friday Mar 3, the report will be considered accepted. Discussion (and questions) are permitted during that time but will not be considered objections unless that is stated explicitly. > I'm not sure if it is legal, but I guess I can rule from the chair to > defer to the next meeting, so as to move the meeting forward. I'd > prefer a motion though, and will allow a few days more before I play > dictator. ... > In the absence of minutes or other reports or motions deferring them > until the next meeting by end of day next Friday, I will rule from the > chair to do so as stated above. No minutes are posted. I will rule from the chair to defer approval of the 2015 meeting minutes to the next meeting when they will be considered along with the 2016 minutes. (mukti is of course welcome to post the minutes before then). >>> After we get done with all reports, we will call for new members, and >>> elect a new Board of Directors. >> >> It is not clear that all reports that will be made are completed, but in >> the interests of moving the meeting along, I call for people wishing to >> become members to speak up now, (along with any proposals by others for >> people not currently present to become members - we will need to get >> them to state that they wish to be members, and get them added to this >> mailing list). > > There have been no volunteers or proposals for new members. Thomas Porter has been moved and seconded as a new member. If no objection before end of day Friday, he will be considered a member. > I will also consider all reports that *have* been made so far to have > been submitted for member acceptance, and they will be considered > accepted without formal motion if there is no objection prior to end of > day next Friday. So ruled. >> Then Board elections, > > Nominations and/or volunteers for the new Board are now in order. The > existing Board can be proposed as a slate if someone would so move, but > I would still like each Board member to post and state that they want to > remain on the Board. The existing Board (informally named) are: lojbab, > Karen, Curtis, gleki, selpa'i, mukti, and Ali. There have been no nominations. mukti has indicated that he wished to remain on the Board. I am also willing, No one else has spoken up. Nominations remain open for Board members. We need a minimum of 4 (and a maximum of 7). > I would like all such nominations and volunteering to also all be posted > by end of day Friday. Then when I post next weekend after that > deadline, we can have the Board election, and then perhaps quickly wrap > up the meeting. Let's try this again this week. Nominal deadline is 3 March. And my usual: If for whatever reason I have not posted again *by end of day Monday (6 Mar)*, I ask the VP to assume the chair and attempt to move the meeting onward, in line with the above and the Bylaw-directed agenda. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members