Received: from localhost ([::1]:55280 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eVKex-0000bj-M1; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:10:59 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:34603) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eVKeS-0000Xq-0w for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:10:28 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y82so8754501wmg.1 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:10:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WjAYXYkFQ+0Vbveqv64R8Lcw5RNJ/QElCtnjfrucW8I=; b=O0uOYUShB0IGWVlHkf11+qsaVEzJwPoI5iQ3FsjbrNbvatCvZ+aSHDcaRr4hOigkpX DHShxdVoZQyIqHaRdQcwAFs7amtuLtvobA9YA8AD6+Mm8w4pfx70cSnaoCGCFk9JQCfc /kyTc0Y3AIznGiLS2dSJ1wDs+Pf4tb/otCYEA+7UWZPo5MgsJkWPfjUV+kDBZPB7mD81 O7Dav7VMT0q+Mc8dZKlakBQMF8Rz4MmN/wlkETj5Q+v3Ze75bVTCyF1puG3a+7HhN+Bm AkQMtMmrnhp+n6e/YA5rUIqLGZf18LuXweXpUXafVn5Fr/GtiFDVfTB2fS7vBefBQVEf nsVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WjAYXYkFQ+0Vbveqv64R8Lcw5RNJ/QElCtnjfrucW8I=; b=YTMLKxcxwQLLzfVWGOo7skXhFK+cYruS7CohoO/jtV3hCu4LAD9cGv49X0TJ37OWkd RPtXeXoDkC1ABctTgWrt00HDUmAHbI9Uh4TtI6uf1EDBlHe05BXscjNhgZSL1ckySVxh JDw5+DtD0ExNUHVFyklQ4mY6Yw0sxm0kegBd3pF+TbSodwVInOMZbx+v+E1+n4gC8SFW SkZDDlzKYhgfMPgwh9YAoK194KHdBPtCaC+bmOkjCFvXrJ4kWmLPhjCbLGMbGbAagjn2 lKJ3M5c0mce/uqCOrCkKLO/p9L0cC5tbOaqHJL1GYyujx0vRBvarjEreMmiOF1SfJPjl +u/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK6dhwyufhSBgwBxxdI0siYBO4yCVHNQ6fBEkZmn8w7MHaMqyvl kvi8a7G4x+J6ETsyrc6KLM4OR9+8CowFx5O0kw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoua0ngZwGFzie7OGyTMceqz+bqMZZZ1PLhb4PC9wuUylKb/yDBn3wn6g87wKu8bZXeq7tX7N4kjHptk2aoQUyk= X-Received: by 10.80.158.196 with SMTP id a62mr49861930edf.307.1514653801965; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:10:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.173.219 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:09:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 20:09:21 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Concerning Unofficial Social Media Presences X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8266872415902484171==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============8266872415902484171== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19b976d2ef07056191d151" --94eb2c19b976d2ef07056191d151 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2017-12-30 19:27 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > Actually, I so move (officially). > I second your motion. > I take it that Gleki's second still applies (since he seconded the wording > verbatim as a motion). However, if the official recordkeeping would prefer > it, one may count Gleki's message here as moving/officially making the > suggestion and this message from me as the second for the motion. > > On Dec 29, 2017 03:06, "Curtis Franks" wrote: > >> I propose (not quite as a motion) that the LLG adopt an official policy >> that the LLG or some body constituted by it for such purpose search for and >> monitor social media or blog platforms, accounts, pages, profiles, groups, >> communities, bots, etc. (hereafter called "entities") which in any way >> whatsoever relate to, promote, or use Lojban or other LLG-adopted logical >> languages and which are not clearly human, personal, non-promoting, or >> unofficial - and that such a body requests such entities to prominently >> display a disclaimer stating that they are unofficial and not endorsed by >> the LLG. >> >> (I do not think that we can enforce such requests, just make them. But >> having an official policy about addressing them may be good and gives us >> some moral 'standing') >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --94eb2c19b976d2ef07056191d151 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2017-12-30 19:27 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gma= il.com>:
= Actually, I so move (officially).

I s= econd your motion.
=C2=A0
I take it that Gleki's second still applies (since he s= econded the wording verbatim as a motion). However, if the official recordk= eeping would prefer it, one may count Gleki's message here as moving/of= ficially making the suggestion and this message from me as the second for t= he motion.

On Dec 29, 2017 03:06, "Curtis = Franks" <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com> wrote:
I propose (not quite as a motio= n) that the LLG adopt an official policy that the LLG or some body constitu= ted by it for such purpose search for and monitor social media or blog plat= forms, accounts, pages, profiles, groups, communities, bots, etc. (hereafte= r called "entities") which in any way whatsoever relate to, promo= te, or use Lojban or other LLG-adopted logical languages and which are not = clearly human, personal, non-promoting, or unofficial - and that such a bod= y requests such entities to prominently display a disclaimer stating that t= hey are unofficial and not endorsed by the LLG.

=
(I do not think that we can enforce such requests, just m= ake them. But having an official policy about addressing them may be good a= nd gives us some moral 'standing')

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--94eb2c19b976d2ef07056191d151-- --===============8266872415902484171== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============8266872415902484171==--