Received: from localhost ([::1]:35252 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXMMo-00079Z-UU; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:24:38 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:41748) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXMMI-00078c-D3 for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:24:07 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id g75so765000wme.0 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:24:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KzKLUkqmvexEzUTMMgEDGqIWt6Ptm5TQuaDlGtByyiE=; b=qDd3S9ddkdJFcKokBU4XhkMmrSawNtItnJtA9MYLvFNhasDBPJAc09u11CABrGLIyA mE5b98QgNy/xWi8MCzV5Ro4BxDLjiWj/TopNJEb016ybKd1D4hnhVsZWWG4cvihIfGv9 skF0SGxOz6ClhhHs9i+y8N80/siFV7yElyKkAWPlOY77HjG45Xtcw90owL6q8yfjYCom mgJ9MuBpRTrzsAsAVu9WduZWMeWbL1tMNM9bgYkH4TTKZjOjpG8V1uRp4YjZVt7Nch8A O+8zPkGmI5rqEYuvRE5/kgtKktafN3aSvC9evwy34dAC3m1HPicf1ZIoxCVIYCac1Yzm cTqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KzKLUkqmvexEzUTMMgEDGqIWt6Ptm5TQuaDlGtByyiE=; b=KnFqfmfczg+PAJ/TrB2+IQJU/4OxD8pIAhkeYwTfi+BgjhwsZRK9i5YbcVomjlv+vp gyuRHHBVQm4nNoJwnY97fZtbTRZ3yOXvfKW4HiLYvskpkKrG5+00Up/T9uD/oO/AXDDU QCKujLT9+du3u4weH+zz1npP9pl/nLHOPk8xGT51MPkpH90zd65Tzts5LuAYtQZ3acYK ndVt+Wg6vO86tf8VglmeZGVuz80zoyi/916L1LzxRrsRc9GO0YOk59vzSkaZhZgYz/Tn knP1P08ts8FscM1zy6PLOlIbiC4AjE7s3zuDZwDz3muAuXKnfz42K4c6xgK5Gb8Hoa9p JZWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLg1vfYNdS99AbkHW7sm5vEyTNkJc/VV/nbxYjZ/Fmccusnls8+ PuZTj3JamrHSYraNSjGuQSE4lKFJds0jpCFIzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotkvk/fEbtElIXMhDVz0nIruAqdBeBTkpg12sjhtRNwsqj4LaN4mZ2DaU3t8sM4KSSBTfWh4E+ZL8mXK1fGc1c= X-Received: by 10.80.244.137 with SMTP id s9mr2884425edm.17.1515137039230; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:23:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.173.219 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:23:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:23:18 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Mailing list subscription X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0927495141559644367==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============0927495141559644367== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c09dc9002697905620255b0" --94eb2c09dc9002697905620255b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > I do not think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for > several reasons, but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should > comb through it (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give > them the benefit of the doubt. > They can read our messages and these are my privacy concerns. > On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" wrote: > >> There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far more >> than the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are just >> silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we decide who >> is eligible and who is not? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --94eb2c09dc9002697905620255b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gma= il.com>:
= I do not think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for severa= l reasons, but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should comb = through it (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give them t= he benefit of the doubt.

They can rea= d our messages and these are my privacy concerns.

=

On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki = Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
<= /span>
Ther= e are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far more than th= e urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are just si= lent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we decide who i= s eligible and who is not?

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--94eb2c09dc9002697905620255b0-- --===============0927495141559644367== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============0927495141559644367==--