Received: from [::1] (port=36950 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXOJ8-0003Bm-6x; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:28:58 -0800 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]:34349) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXOIb-0003Ag-Dx for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:28:26 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j192so2910619vkc.1 for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:28:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=awls/NhDFuMSnXbDqnzLzml+C0mRu+TCMVHdFExOHNo=; b=gKKnX3uuZLQDX48DXGP2d37lTvPp8xB8AfqxbpdEE585EnYstQ+OaQkOVsGX4v3z39 V6nekfUCPI0ZnFfn7c4MLc6Lx+1SXvn9C5cRUp9CHVLxKG0Q+NelMZuLA2vXqqYvLz+j w3vRp3JAAyhVu7ZBf77tBNRDHfdd6664IuiaX43nNX6OFtuEfMuFGDyLXMRX+tuGghYZ CHeYuROYFpUHy0Y/OUUN/4lOcau1e9Fx1oM6w8Gc7aAZhxM50ddSorWPtqCZVeNqoxKP ECk8CiCODctV3ublVp/P/nBumQ7lr48bKyL8Y9PUPukitPcJc0tYCsauSURmFbFTGTGV ZbnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=awls/NhDFuMSnXbDqnzLzml+C0mRu+TCMVHdFExOHNo=; b=TwNahJyeVoJrtbog3PnD9GUHVKTry3YMbkO8URRHVL97iQX0zQqYjg3M1MjxWfJRy9 112+WZ6MSJs0PFBWCUFPfY5woTMJKcBCo+h1eK90qq6+VqTuGN6oG9xKflr21S8KbJm3 oWQPVLAFr8d+EUUDkidahfI88QRSummy9l+rzMHX2lRZnBPzCisTVXajjA313nAJautA mOlwBFRNJMmXK0905owXbcW9yA8BGS0jd/znVC7XANFgW50liwSasKx2fh3us/4bA0+0 oxlb1eTmGfw0xnwCk2BS9plM66VHg8rJB2obvIVwG+Z2ZveljrUXJ8n6H5zMLOeMVZWy m9yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKKmMHYkReq4sngOBqMoeFHqvzGnWpjHIHV8gsjQ3n/WANjkL+/ 0tKSjepP7CitFRU9Tz8d6FJDcvLoHiKe7qSLfsU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovEYDS8GR0mB0M/9VB1SHKZepxmlilyYpnCXuDrRCrV0eQ2KRRTZrQ76hJbAd07enBkLnL2EzvTcDbHCYQfROQ= X-Received: by 10.159.37.227 with SMTP id 90mr2575813uaf.166.1515144498269; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:28:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.27.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 01:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.27.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 01:28:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Creative Care Services Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_bar: ---- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Mailing list subscription X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1370703512792886122==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============1370703512792886122== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b0bf29a55360562041144" --001a113b0bf29a55360562041144 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I was planning on that as actively posting during this meeting is such a statement by default. My preference is still to be told specifically, though, for clarity and so I, as President, and my extension the other officers, had a coherent list of participants. Riley is expected to include this list in the minutes, after all, with people left as "and x numbers of others who wish to remain anonymous" I guess, if they tell me this is their preference. .karis. On Jan 5, 2018 04:11, "Curtis Franks" wrote: > I ask that anyone who actively participates in this meeting in any > capacity automatically be retained, regardless of whether they message you > privately to such effect. > > On Jan 5, 2018 3:30 AM, "Creative Care Services" > wrote: > >> I understand that there are people receiving these messages who are >> probably not interested in passivity, or at least following, or >> discussions. Because we are in the midst of multiple active conversations I >> ask that any attempts to cull the list occur outside the meeting. In the >> meatime, and to prepare for that effort, would each person who i wants to >> be actively involved in any capacity (posting, following discussions, or >> whatever) please send a private email to me within 10 days. That will give >> us the information we need when culling is carried out. >> >> .karis. >> comcaresvcs@gmail.com >> >> >> >> On Jan 5, 2018 02:48, "Curtis Franks" wrote: >> >> I meant that they are not entitled to remain private from us, I claim. >> >> On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : >>> >>>> I do not think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for >>>> several reasons, but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should >>>> comb through it (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give >>>> them the benefit of the doubt. >>>> >>> >>> They can read our messages and these are my privacy concerns. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far >>>>> more than the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are >>>>> just silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we >>>>> decide who is eligible and who is not? >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --001a113b0bf29a55360562041144 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was planning on that as actively posting during this me= eting is such a statement by default. My preference is still to be told spe= cifically, though, for clarity and so I, as President, and my extension the= other officers, had a coherent list of participants. Riley is expected to = include this list in the minutes, after all, with people left as "and = x numbers of others who wish to remain anonymous" I guess, if they tel= l me this is their preference.

.karis.=C2=A0

On Jan 5, 2018 04:11, "Curtis Franks" <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com> wrote:
I ask= that anyone who actively participates in this meeting in any capacity auto= matically be retained, regardless of whether they message you privately to = such effect.

On Jan 5, 2018 3:30 AM, "Creative Care Services" <comcaresvcs@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
I understand that there are people receiving these messages = who are probably not interested in passivity, or at least following, or dis= cussions. Because we are in the midst of multiple active conversations I as= k that any attempts to cull the list occur outside the meeting. In the meat= ime, and to prepare for that effort, would each person who i wants to be ac= tively involved in any capacity (posting, following discussions, or whateve= r) please send a private email to me within 10 days. That will give us the = information we need when culling is carried out.=C2=A0

.karis.=C2=A0



On Jan 5, 2018 02:48,= "Curtis Franks" <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com> wrote:
I meant that they are not entitled to remain private f= rom us, I claim.

On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:


2018= -01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
I do not = think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for several reasons= , but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should comb through i= t (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give them the benefi= t of the doubt.

They can read our mes= sages and these are my privacy concerns.



On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" <= ;gleki.is.m= y.name@gmail.com> wrote:
There are 48 email addresses subs= cribed to this list, which is far more than the urrent members + candidate = members. I'm sure some of them are just silent spammers. Should I post = all the addresses here so that we decide who is eligible and who is not?
_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members



_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members



_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members

--001a113b0bf29a55360562041144-- --===============1370703512792886122== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============1370703512792886122==--