Received: from localhost ([::1]:36940 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ2xO-0007ml-RS; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:05:22 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:41340) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ2ws-0007lW-BY for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:04:51 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id g75so23497171wme.0 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:04:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c9/BMi/FFKo+//wBVQNsuAQZeeUlnTkEfj6w4GFfLhI=; b=ofbatR2h2ta7hFDa3c8vKLBXId88LAn2qhkBb7KbSaS0aLg6w77AOIKMKxKC63l8iy l/aN4EV2wHaT/z1uve2L5kXWjhLueDYOX0jfxnJIF+EYTXoYcyWrMti03X8vOpSNnAyf 3y8ZmxFJRiJFkCdsudPAddiLBrHwG8/2isac1r6zRlLw3FuoaCIQarRNw0tV/S6zI6ib ee4Os8Av+cuHO6mFGsuCpbFTiVYXXHJtBDfT4UDa304OtV3jG1XyljPXoecNkIcCvsuj LiSBBrHB+Pk4cFHXhxNrlVXa17RYemEYa4mUz/S+kniCMBsdY/dEIIHdVBWE9aoU+Dgj bLig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=c9/BMi/FFKo+//wBVQNsuAQZeeUlnTkEfj6w4GFfLhI=; b=lE0b1YMZKZCWV7hilPNHufvCIyqRXQlprtqCu7QQoHOCvzp96+2Y07TpFOS1QxgbJj PZW6mDMdbuzlgkhvx+bU/5/s+atu1v61i2Y48J/XgmSb84FeznDY/tWRBSgpoPGiPup9 F2synvCmcAKStEh8CJJg8ySkiOHPFK6BPuW/ABr6iGgI0VLO7BIjEmjXQwSPSxoSanhA bPbsovDHJpyOBD+64cvwffrJN4Qf8DRn3IzGiKL6JPs2EHsemSh2up6uCYzCWp69UWuM ZJw3lXFJEDxRUGx+fnQKuC5rgTMwvXoYp1AnWIRzbdTEAYFfVDHAChFEAct2qep2G9kr 91Uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIiPTuMyGx7FnGa3XvbNlJKtvNeUewN6jvOjOs/dlQ7aCYm6+kQ 5ihKRAX1xQ/MVeR6ewmtjzBqTF2NgOKAQur8/nI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov1UioffKAiVpFlviGWYq8bCZH+hw0iRV/BGoy6TIOjXFPWvLs1C3jtTJ7dhCoiXMhl81Zef8+9GWudyhzODS0= X-Received: by 10.80.148.29 with SMTP id p29mr22884793eda.302.1515539083494; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:04:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.224.69 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:04:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0ba6a243-8377-9af3-aa22-8072b3f17664@selpahi.de> <75ae7cbf-1dd4-a9ab-9342-734847d1d4d6@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:04:42 -0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Missing proposals? X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6234052121973147758==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============6234052121973147758== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c23d4b70a9905625ff051" --f403045c23d4b70a9905625ff051 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mi ji'a zanru mi'e xorxes On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Riley Martinez-Lynch wrote: > I also approve of selpa=E2=80=99i continuing as BPFK chair. > > The BPFK re-authorization provides guidelines so that there is a defined > process in the case that the chair steps down and LLG is not immediately > able to nominate a successor. Nobody who takes on this role should feel > obliged to do so. When we have someone who is willing to lead it, we will > have a BPFK, and when we don=E2=80=99t, there=E2=80=99s a way to start th= ings back up when > we do. > > I want to thank selpa=E2=80=99i for continuing in this often thankless ta= sk. I > hope that he will take care of himself as well as language planning for > lojban. > > =E2=80=94 Riley no=E2=80=99u la mukti > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > > I also approve. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Ilmen wrote: > >> I approve of Selpahi remaining the Chair. >> >> =E2=80=94Ilmen. >> >> >> On 08/01/2018 20:59, selpahi wrote: >> >>> On 08.01.2018 20:13, Adam Lopresto wrote: >>> >>>> I vote Aye on selpahi for BPFK Chair. I don't think there's anyone >>>> who's disagreed with him as strongly as I have about certain particula= r >>>> choices, but we are all better off for having him in that position. >>>> >>> >>> It probably doesn't matter, but the things I remember you being the mos= t >>> upset about were the ban on consonant-glides and the non-yet-decided >>> removal of {broda be ba brode}. The former was decided before the BPFK >>> reauthorization (i.e., before I was Chair), and could be considered to = have >>> an unclear state of officialness. I didn't really have anything to do w= ith >>> it (other than being one of many who had a vote). {broda be ba brode} i= s >>> still undecided, but again, I only have one vote and more than half of = the >>> BPFK members have voted in favor of removing it. I understand that I, a= s >>> the Chair, am always going to take the blame for the actions of committ= ee >>> as a whole, but I think it's worth noting that my influence is just as = big >>> as that of any BPFK member: one vote. >>> >>> And thank you. >>> >>> ~~~mi'e la selpa'i >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --f403045c23d4b70a9905625ff051 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
mi ji'a zanru

mi'e xorxes
=

On Tue, Jan= 9, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com> wrote:
I also approve of selpa=E2=80=99i continuing as BPFK chair.

The BPFK re-authorization provides guidelines so that ther= e is a defined process in the case that the chair steps down and LLG is not= immediately able to nominate a successor. Nobody who takes on this role sh= ould feel obliged to do so. When we have someone who is willing to lead it,= we will have a BPFK, and when we don=E2=80=99t, there=E2=80=99s a way to s= tart things back up when we do.

I want to thank se= lpa=E2=80=99i for continuing in this often thankless task. I hope that he w= ill take care of himself as well as language planning for lojban.

=E2=80=94 Riley no=E2=80=99u la mukti

On Jan 9, 2= 018, at 5:12 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:

I also approve.<= /div>

On Tue, Jan = 9, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com> wr= ote:
I approve of Selpahi remaining the C= hair.<= br>
=E2=80=94Ilmen.


On 08/01/2018 20:59, selpahi wrote:
On 08.01.2018 20:13, Adam Lopresto wrote:
I vote Aye on selpahi for BPFK Chair. I don't think there's anyone = who's disagreed with him as strongly as I have about certain particular= choices, but we are all better off for having him in that position.

It probably doesn't matter, but the things I remember you being the mos= t upset about were the ban on consonant-glides and the non-yet-decided remo= val of {broda be ba brode}. The former was decided before the BPFK reauthor= ization (i.e., before I was Chair), and could be considered to have an uncl= ear state of officialness. I didn't really have anything to do with it = (other than being one of many who had a vote). {broda be ba brode} is still= undecided, but again, I only have one vote and more than half of the BPFK = members have voted in favor of removing it. I understand that I, as the Cha= ir, am always going to take the blame for the actions of committee as a who= le, but I think it's worth noting that my influence is just as big as t= hat of any BPFK member: one vote.

And thank you.

~~~mi'e la selpa'i


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing= list
Llg-me= mbers@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo= /llg-members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--f403045c23d4b70a9905625ff051-- --===============6234052121973147758== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============6234052121973147758==--