From treed@surreality.us Fri Jul 22 17:55:00 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-160-143-17.ontrca.adelphia.net ([69.160.143.17] helo=[192.168.1.42])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dw8I3-00023m-25
	for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:54:58 -0700
Subject: [llg-members] Re: Supplicatory Model: papri
From: Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20050723002055.GL2444@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20050716010140.GU2444@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <42D95380.802@lojban.org> <20050718044439.GE2444@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <42DB5132.1040507@lojban.org> <925d1756050722083624970a05@mail.gmail.com>
	 <007d01c58f19$acc170c0$973e0751@sonyvaio>
	 <1122077937.2288.0.camel@localhost>
	 <20050723002055.GL2444@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-60FYbLtG/oakVFNu412C"
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:55:00 -0700
Message-Id: <1122080100.2288.7.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.5.1 
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-archive-position: 35
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org
X-list: llg-members


--=-60FYbLtG/oakVFNu412C
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:20 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 05:18:57PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 00:41 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > > This prompts me to wonder how many papri a concertina book
> > > contains -- a single leaf, folded. In English, the folds create
> > > multiple pages, so a page is not the same as a leaf.
> > >=20
> > > I would still maintain that a webpage is a kind of document,
> > > though I don't know offhand what gismu best renders 'document'.
> >=20
> > te tcidu?
>=20
> I *really* don't like the agentive nature of "te tcidu"; it means
> that a document isn't unless it's being read.

I would argue that it doesn't need to be being read, but that it must be
capable of being read, or read at some time in the past or future. Or
hell, you can even say "noda tcidu fi ti"

mu'omi'e.bancus

--=-60FYbLtG/oakVFNu412C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBC4ZVkw24JwM4aDNwRApN8AKDkeWIbXLSvPSyAy4DvyNllGT15fACghaaX
IQSk6eIWFNokWLGSNmyTAAE=
=0HNr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-60FYbLtG/oakVFNu412C--