From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 30 20:03:36 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EhffS-0001wU-8b for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:34 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:34 -0800 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2005 LLG Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20051201040334.GF18294@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20051115212824.GM8740@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20051126011734.GX20158@miranda.org> <20051128062658.GA2289@miranda.org> <20051128081254.GM16858@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051128081254.GM16858@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 116 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:12:54AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > The BPFK is a bit stagnant right now, and a large part of the > reason is that only about 3 of the commissioners are really > active. I would dearly love to see more active BPFK > commissioners, but a pretty firm grasp of Lojban is definately a > prerequisite. I see no reason to limit this to LLG members, so > please speak up if you know someone outside of the LLG who could > help! So no-one wants to be active on the BPFK who isn't, and no-one has any ideas on how to increase BPFK activity or has anyone else to suggest for it? Lovely. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/