From and.rosta@gmail.com Tue Nov 15 16:33:18 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EcBEe-0006GO-6i for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:33:15 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t16so1630373wxc for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:33:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=QQeLSEOtq6MRDbPex4wJ4fJLqkW9gDr6IM1zie8UqGro1gGaTM1nGyvGN67+Lspn58drnr5LAda4kiPixGg5xt13tt6aitTZiUAzwdi+49jUNEYHaK8ajGfSroZQlOLBtkYISVtv11OgRXd/UMfiTyAdHLVgOABIlEeipoy3f+w= Received: by 10.65.218.2 with SMTP id v2mr7794002qbq; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:33:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?81.7.57.5? ( [81.7.57.5]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e17sm4131790qba.2005.11.15.16.33.08; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:33:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <437A75C9.2090005@v21.me.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:56:57 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org, Robin Lee Powell Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2005 LLG Annual Meeting Thread References: <20051115212824.GM8740@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20051115213746.GN8740@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20051115213746.GN8740@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: And Rosta X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-archive-position: 83 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: and.rosta@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Robin Lee Powell, On 15/11/2005 21:37: > LLG Members are members of a business organization. As such, their > primary responsibility is to be available to vote on the actions of > that organization as necessary. No skill in Lojban is required.[1] [...] > [1]: Those of you who have been around for a while will notice that > this is a rather sharp reversal of my former stance. Having been > the guy who runs the business for a couple of years now, it is Very > Strongly my belief that the LLG should be purely a business entity. > In fact, I'd like to see the LLG stripped to the board alone for > conducting business matters and a seperate, non-corporate, Lojban > activists organization develop, but I haven't had time to put > together a proposal for that this year. These ideas all sound very good. Would be good if it turned out to be possible to introduce it as a proposal during the current meeting. --And.