From dlb@patriot.net Tue Dec 06 03:25:16 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [65.204.116.3] (helo=IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ejavq-0002nP-Mo for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:24:46 -0800 Received: from magenta (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB6BOC113733 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:24:13 -0700 Message-ID: <005801c5fa57$9ad869a0$fcc111ac@magenta> From: "David Barton" To: References: <4394A169.20900@lojban.org> <20051201200613.GR18294@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20051201202224.GU18294@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20051202185542.GA9262@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <4390B58A.9060605@lojban.org> <43944034.1080608@bilkent.edu.tr> <4394A169.20900@lojban.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20051205193640.04158cd0@pop.east.cox.net> Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2005 LLG Annual Meeting Thread Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:24:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 138 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: dlb@patriot.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members And even though it is being approved by acclamation with no objection, I also approve, and thank Robin for his service. Dave Barton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nora LeChevalier" To: Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:38 PM Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2005 LLG Annual Meeting Thread > At 03:43 PM 12/5/05 -0700, Jay wrote: >>On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:22:01PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> > I'll call the question, and suggest that Jay lead the vote on this so >> > that Robin doesn't have to chair his own honor. I'd suggest a vote by >> > acclamation, though I think that in the past has normally called for an >> > actual vote so that the recipient of honor actually see people voting >> > for that honor, so I leave it to the chair(s) discretion how best to do >> > it in this less formal meeting system. >> >>Ah, fell asleep at the helm, there, I'm afraid. Sorry. >> >>While it would be nice to allow everyone to vote for it, I'd hate to >>see the most important part of the year's meeting fail because too few >>people were paying attention. So as with the other portions of the >>meeting, the "thank Robin Powell for his outstanding service to the >>community this past year" motion will be passed by acclamation, as >>well. The one week period for objections started with the seconding, >>on Friday. >> >>Of course, one can still voice their approval of the motion. > > I whole-heartedly approve [i'ecai]! > > >>The period for new business ended as well, with only Robin's request >>for BPFK assistance being brought up. And no forgotten old business was >>brought to our attention. So this Friday, and the end of the objection >>period will signal the completion of this year's meeting. >> >>-- >>Jay Kominek > > > -- > mi'e noras noras@cox.net > Nora LeChevalier > > > >