From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jan 01 20:35:44 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sun, 01 Jan 2006 20:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EtHQ5-00067J-ML for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2006 20:35:41 -0800 Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 20:35:41 -0800 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: News of my untimely demise is greatly exaggerated Message-ID: <20060102043541.GN4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <4FCA63CC-9EC4-485C-9B62-B3C2F48C70A4@whitlock.org> <20051229092349.GI4222@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 159 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:55:59PM -0500, TommyLee Whitlock wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Robin! > > On Dec 29, 2005, at 4:23 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >For the record: e-mail has been the only form of notice for the > >meetings for at least 3 years now. But I'll try to remember (or > >poke Bob to remember) to phone you. > > I wondered why I hadn't heard about a lojfest in a while. > > I would recommend that this be changed for the various reasons > that I listed before. In any other group I've been in, and also > llg in the past, if an email response was not received in a > reasonable amount of time, then alternative methods of contact > were to be employed. I was perhaps unclear: e-mail is the *only* form of contact I have for the vast majority of the members. It actually turns out I *do* have your phone number in the accounts, but that's true for precious few other Lojbanists. > For example, I see that for whatever reasons, you've taken 18 > days to send a reply to this message and another two days for me > to reply you. I read the mail to make sure there was nothing important in it before I ignored it for two weeks. :-) > Meanwhile, I think I've resolved the problem on my end and have > created a mailbox for llg correspondence alone to keep it > separated from the rest of the lojban mail that I receive. Excellent. Thanks. > A very Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year to you and to all in > the Lojban community! Thank you! To you as well. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/