From lojbab@lojban.org Mon Jan 02 16:50:32 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lojbab@lojban.org>)
	id 1EtaNd-0007hV-60
	for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:50:30 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.250.99.39]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060103005016.NXEV14098.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]>
          for <llg-members@lojban.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 19:50:16 -0500
Message-ID: <43B9CA48.6010606@lojban.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:50:16 -0500
From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  llg-members@lojban.org
Subject: [llg-members] Re: Random amusement: Level -1
References: <20060102101828.GZ4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060103004251.GA3583@ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060103004251.GA3583@ccil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 164
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org
X-list: llg-members

John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> 
> 
>>For the record (barring objections): it is the official policy of
>>the LLG that if people send us snail mail with non-specific requests
>>for information about Lojban, we send them a copy of "What Is
>>Lojban?", at our expense, through Lightning Source.
> 
> 
> We may have to change this if we ever get media notice (one of JCB's problems
> was his inability to handle the flood of interest he got after the 1960
> Scientific American article), but until then I agree it's fine: merging
> Level 0 with Level -1 is fine.
> 
> There is still the Level -2 one-page flyer that I put together one Logfest.
> Has that surfaced anywhere?  (I'm in haste, so sorry if there's an obvious answer.)

There are multiple such flyers.  Someone had some at LogFest, but they 
weren't the one you made (for one thing these flyers were folded and 
thus LOOKED like a brochure).  At which point I am inclined to suspect 
Epcot (Matt).

lojbab