From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jul 07 18:24:36 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fz1Yg-0004sB-8C for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:24:34 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:24:34 -0700 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20060708012434.GI18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 192 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Formally, we need a motion to vote, and then a second, then we vote. 'Round these parts, we just do a lot of things by acclimation. So, please speak up if you *don't* accept the minutes as they stand. Voting will continue until Wednesday 12 July 2006, or until I remember this meeting exists, whichever comes first. :-) -Robin On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:43:04PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > I vote to accept the minutes as they stand. > -Matt Arnold > > On 7/7/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > >This year's meeting is going to take place on the mailing list > >during the month of July (and in to August if necessary). I am > >chairing. The meeting will take place in a format as much like a > >face-to-face meeting as possible; that is, motions, discussion, and > >voting will all be interspersed as the chair determines is > >appropriate. > > > >The meeting starts right now, but I'll probably wait a few days > >before I actually *do* anything, to give people time to be > >attentive. > > > >Some general notes: > > > > Non-LLG members who wish to observe will be added to the mailing > > list on an ad hoc basis. If you feel the need to discuss > > something that requires their non-presence, send me private > > e-mail and I'll figure something out. As this has basically > > never happened before, I'm not especially worried. > > > > All standing proxies are hereby invalidated. This is a > > vote-by-mail situation, and everyone is present on the mailing > > list. If you're going to be away from e-mail for the entire > > voting period and really need to proxy, please say so, but you > > must make a new proxy statement this year. > > > > > >Here's the agenda: > > > >1) Roll call > > > > This is waived because the meeting is on the mailing list, which > > has been verified to have a valid e-mail address for all > > members. > > > > In lieu of roll call, I will be making a list at the end of all > > memebers who did not directly participate in the meeting, for > > use next year. > > > >2) Reading of minutes > > > > Waived. Read them yourself at > > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=LLG+2005+Annual+Meeting+Minutes&bl > > > > The vote to accept those minutes will occur here. > > > >3) Officer's reports > > > >4) Committee reports > > > >5) Election of new members > > > >6) Removal of old members > > > > Members not participating in any form last year: > > > > Burgess, Gary > > Desquilbet, Jerome > > Hodges, John > > Le Du, Yann > > Lynch, Keith > > Nicholas, Nick > > O'Sullivan, Paul Francis > > Speer, Rob > > Shoulson, Mark > > Vilva, Veijo > > Weeks, Stephen (made a member during the meeting but not present > > for it, due to clerical error on my part) > > > > Whether we should *do* anything about any of these is a matter > > for discussion; while I believe I have valid e-mail addresses > > for all of them, I can't absolutely guarantee it. In > > particular, Stephen doesn't appear to have actually been on the > > list, which is my fault. > > > > I can not, in particular, guarantee that I have valid e-mail > > addresses for the following people, as they did not respond to a > > test mail: > > > > Dyke, Gregory > > Desquilbet, Jerome > > Hope, Charles > > Lynch, Keith > > Speer, Rob > > > >7) Election of the Board > > > > Currently, only the incumbents are running. > > > >8) Old business > > > > I'm not aware of any. > > > >9) New business > > > > None proposed yet > > > >-Robin > > > >-- > >http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > >Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" > >Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ > > > > > > > > -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/