From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jul 07 23:00:20 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 07 Jul 2006 23:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fz5rV-0001yf-Mk for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 23:00:17 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:00:17 -0700 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20060708060017.GK18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060708012434.GI18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 199 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:33:05PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > On 7/7/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >Formally, we need a motion to vote, and then a second, then we > >vote. > > > >'Round these parts, we just do a lot of things by acclimation. > > > >So, please speak up if you *don't* accept the minutes as they > >stand. > > It seems to me that this policy will have difficulty when combined > with the "Remembering who didn't participate last year" policy. If > we don't disagree with anything, how do we participate? Yeah, that thought crossed my mind too. :-| This had a fair bit to do with the "I'm not sure we should do anything about this" comment in the agenda. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/