From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Mon Jul 10 07:49:50 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fzx50-0000jF-LP for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:49:47 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k26so6779nfc for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:49:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IyQcpV69DrTJgL06SIl8iQTQAzDFq3U2pU2axtpm2NeBQ9twImbR3txrLMFHOiWyW0fvc77R1kwULMy9Oze8nKSzFi9h0iUwwJh6LsvGuDG2mIhzagv2tE6MxpgBFf+x7pUEn3uoknT6MQC1/nB34l7ktc49KGAfEeJmmqi04iQ= Received: by 10.78.156.6 with SMTP id d6mr1723481hue; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.121.7 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:49:44 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 217 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On 7/10/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > - The BPFK is currently stuck in the Attitudinals checkpoint. There is > little controversial material here; it's just that the sections are > numerous, large, and very boring. There is also a lack of shepherds > who are able and willing to put in an effort. From this description, this checkpoint does not require an unusual degree of expertise beyond a typical semi-fluency. Would it be safe for me to do this? -epkat