From lojbab@lojban.org Mon Jul 10 10:31:36 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzzbX-0003pj-7p for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:31:34 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.250.99.39]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060710173124.JFTG7951.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:31:24 -0400 Message-ID: <44B28ED2.20500@lojban.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:30:58 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44AFDF4A.7070009@lojban.org> <44B03DAC.5050108@lojban.org> <20060710140628.GV27480@miranda.org> In-Reply-To: <20060710140628.GV27480@miranda.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 218 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Jay F Kominek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:20:12PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > >>While I do not necessarily object to Robin chairing the meeting, I would >>like an explanation on the record for why the President and Vice >>President of LLG (who per the bylaws have the responsibility and backup >>responsibility for calling and chairing the annual meeting) are not >>doing so (and in fact have not even posted publicly to the thread >>showing their presence). > > This meeting started while I was fencing at the US Summer Nationals in > Atlanta. When I left, I didn't even realize the meeting would be starting > while I was gone. (I had seen mentions that it was impending, but that > was it.) I just returned home late last night. So, not a lot of opportunity > to post. No criticism intended for an explainable absence (hope you did well in Atlanta - write a report in Lojban, and invent some new fencing terms %^). I just wanted an explanation on the record. lojbab