From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jul 10 14:15:48 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G036Y-0008Ez-Un for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:15:47 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:15:46 -0700 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20060710211546.GY3440@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 219 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:49:44AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > On 7/10/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Robin Lee Powell wrote: - The BPFK is > >currently stuck in the Attitudinals checkpoint. There is little > >controversial material here; it's just that the sections are > >numerous, large, and very boring. There is also a lack of > >shepherds who are able and willing to put in an effort. > > From this description, this checkpoint does not require an unusual > degree of expertise beyond a typical semi-fluency. Would it be > safe for me to do this? Probably. Please bring it up with me-as-BPFK-jatna seperately later. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/