From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jul 18 16:58:04 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G2zRy-0005YL-Gl for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:58:02 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:58:02 -0700 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20060718235802.GV18359@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44AFDF4A.7070009@lojban.org> <44B03DAC.5050108@lojban.org> <20060709230652.GB3440@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44B1BF69.8030605@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44B1BF69.8030605@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 227 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members The secretary apologizes for falling a bit behind; got sick. On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 10:46:01PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >>that if these exist online, there should be links to them > >>incorporated > >>>in the minutes. > > > >The officer's and committee reports don't, yet, exist at all. > >When they exist, I'll try to get them online, yes. > > Since these are minutes from *last years* meeting, what is needed > are links to the verbatim postings that were made by officers and > committee/project chairs *last year*. Sorry, I get it now. Fixed; see http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=LLG+2005+Annual+Meeting+Minutes The new deadline for objections is Tuesday, 25 July 2006, at midnight UTC. > I had no complaint about Arnt's efforts (or yours for that > matter). I merely noted to myself that one of the major > legitimate complaints about my modus operandi as president was > that I made decisions, discussing them with an officer or two > (Nora or John) and carried them out without putting it formally to > the Board, and sometimes without recording a formal explanation. > Given your post-transition focus on LLG as a legal and business > entity, I am especially concerned with watching for those > activities which might be troublesome in that context. Understood and appreciated; I honestly *forgot* that we hadn't consulted the whole board. Very much my bad, and I explicitely request that you continue to hound me about this sort of thing in the future. > The post-transition officers HAVE been taking short cuts without > discussing them with the Board, different ones than the sorts that > I took, because the people and circumstances are different. As > long as I hold get to remind you that we sometimes need to pay > attention to following formal procedures, I am happy to let most > things slide by with an explanation on the record. Explaining what's going on isn't going to kill me; I'd rather you erred on the side of hounding me. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/