From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Mon Aug 07 07:17:29 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.238]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GA5v3-0007AL-Sp for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:17:26 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so530809wxc for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qm9mm0GUmQpF9H2p284dV0i15Pm2VOrERwtaWNwC51KpeodNPrM2LLgaj6VQWmNn97yGatj3XZLcF6WIQBPpuPUqxnxgiWDy2zNWw9bwtadwJ/mNdrCP52odVD/nB3C4fEG+0MkCa1ok3oewjkok2vCHnizs5cOGS/p09TBcmVU= Received: by 10.78.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr2391994hue; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.159.4 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:17:24 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread In-Reply-To: <44D6D0E3.30801@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060807041126.GE28190@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44D6D0E3.30801@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 235 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On 8/7/06, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > 1. Per Gary Burgess's proxy, I would like some discussion of publishing > some sort of Lojban dictionary, paper or otherwise. I'd prefer not to > make a motion, but will put one on the floor if necessary. I consider this very important, and support Bob's statement. > 2. I would also like to discuss whether we are planning to hold a > LogFest at Philcon this year. I'll ask on a point of information > whether any contacts of other efforts have been made by others in this > regard before making any motions myself. Those who were present at the > end may recall that a discussion between me and the leader of the > Klingon Language Institute included the possibility of some joint > programming at Philcon involving both organizations for our mutual benefit. > > Ideally, we would plan and promote this a little more so we get more > turnout this year. I'm hoping myself to be there the whole weekend this > year instead of only one day. Sadly, I can't afford to attend Philcon this year and don't have reliable transportation. But the Klingon/Lojban joint programming sounds very promising. -epkat