From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Mon Aug 07 12:01:45 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GAAMA-0001og-1x for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:01:43 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a27so934285nfc for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:01:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TBcu5tXTtBY+62/LbDbLGycBM9zZ7+YjzjMYsaUQ4brTZr/3N9GJTSNW5Cqdk0X2pl6u7/PdWn0QJB/yqyvJRw/M6Yz/J3JZ8YUHwkw4gV4qUVvSEJNIizkuoonEEBH/pvgay91inQZ6nkjNOuF2Ev4WnXz/hozcd9bNSMyzchM= Received: by 10.78.124.2 with SMTP id w2mr2484721huc; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.159.4 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:01:40 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread In-Reply-To: <55b258c20608070650h49460f55j94594cfa5e5ac0e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060807041126.GE28190@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44D6D0E3.30801@lojban.org> <55b258c20608070650h49460f55j94594cfa5e5ac0e6@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 241 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On 8/7/06, Craig Daniel wrote: > What distinguishes this proposed dictionary from Jbovlaste? > Technically, jbovlaste is not quite official. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) We don't stand on formalities, so we treat it as official anyway; but it would be nice to get a PDF such as the one it generates and give it official imprimatur. Also, at certain times there have been proposals to translate the gismu and cmavo definitions into Lojban and call that the dictionary. -epkat