From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Mon Aug 07 13:48:22 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GAC1L-0005kR-62 for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:48:20 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a27so964302nfc for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QN/pmFTRWtS1VNc0DMjXQEvwEF76pyeVLflZHC/DxSyhJP8E+XDnqUtOE6saKhSKhldGcnmuc8N/HBjqcNBHdgpqETNP5HeBLhMwAN6jxG98mz8+cn7t6pTJQzg+wCo62b3EEGWH8hBNR38b1ROHd2TqhcMo+Aq13a/aDiSax/w= Received: by 10.78.118.19 with SMTP id q19mr2523687huc; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.159.4 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:48:17 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread In-Reply-To: <925d17560608071342k2d9a496bvf0f60286e051bcef@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060807041126.GE28190@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44D6D0E3.30801@lojban.org> <55b258c20608070650h49460f55j94594cfa5e5ac0e6@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560608071342k2d9a496bvf0f60286e051bcef@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 243 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On 8/7/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 8/7/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > > > > Also, at certain times there have been proposals to translate the > > gismu and cmavo definitions into Lojban and call that the dictionary. > > The cmavo definitions are all translated into Lojban in jbovlaste, although > they have never been revised and checked for consistency with BPFK > work. Only a few gismu definitions have been translated so far. > > mi'e xorxes > I think I will start putting them on jboselkei. -epkat