From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 08 16:24:36 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GAaw6-0004rv-9V for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:24:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:24:34 -0700 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG 2006 Annual Meeting Thread Message-ID: <20060808232434.GZ28190@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20060707224943.GB18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060807041126.GE28190@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <44D6D0E3.30801@lojban.org> <55b258c20608070650h49460f55j94594cfa5e5ac0e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 253 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:01:40PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > On 8/7/06, Craig Daniel wrote: > >What distinguishes this proposed dictionary from Jbovlaste? > > > > Technically, jbovlaste is not quite official. (Someone correct me > if I'm wrong.) We don't stand on formalities, so we treat it as > official anyway; but it would be nice to get a PDF such as the one > it generates and give it official imprimatur. I will vote against anything involving producing an official dictionary until the BPFK is done. If you want a dictionary, help the BPFK. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/